Teams

CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Singh

Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CIN Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Men, W

11 players · average NTRP 3.93 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-09vs CIN A18 4.0M IRCD LoweryWon 21
W#1 DoublesJASON RICHMOND / Paul Lee vs Anthony Winkler / Nick Bantz6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMicah MacKison vs Daniel Lomelino7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Hines / Matthew Meyer vs Dax Lowery / Christopher Layton6-1, 6-2
2025-02-11vs CIN A18 4.0M IRCD BocadeWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Meyer / Bryce Sadler vs Christopher Holcomb / Zach Richardson7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBryce Hernly vs Arjun Bhalla2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMicah MacKison / Ramsaran Singh vs Michael Wade / Jeffrey Curry6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-04vs CIN A18 4.0M CRC HusmannLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharles Hinkle / Denis Ryan vs Greer MacKebee / Kevin Stutey3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBryce Hernly vs Adam Herstig7-5, 2-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCliff Dickinson / Damon Grothe vs Jeff Springer / David Kupinski3-6, 3-6
2025-01-28vs CIN A18 4.0M IHP FischerLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharles Hinkle / Denis Ryan vs Marco Vasquez / Joshua Ruse2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBryce Sadler vs George Go2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Meyer / Christopher Hines vs Jeff Furois / Nick Kellum6-7, 1-6
2025-01-21vs CIN A18 4.0M IUTC PiekarskyLost 12
L#1 DoublesRamsaran Singh / JASON RICHMOND vs Colton Butcher / Mark Ochsner3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBryce Hernly vs Sungyun Kang6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDamon Grothe / Christopher Hines vs Tom Monroe / Jeremy Earle3-6, 4-6
2025-01-14vs CIN A18 4.0M WIRC YangWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Meyer / JASON RICHMOND vs Will Pearl / Bill Ratthahao7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBryce Hernly vs Christos Mousas6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCliff Dickinson / Ramsaran Singh vs Morris Yang / Ian Sequeira7-6, 4-1
2025-01-07vs CIN A18 4.0M WIRC BrunerWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Lee / Matthew Meyer vs Martin Bruner / Paul Musson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBryce Sadler vs Michael Rothbaum6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJASON RICHMOND / Christopher Hines vs Sean Ferbrache / Jay Wetzel1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · CIN Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Men, W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN A18 4.0M JCC Barrett6016212155
2CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Bocade6115620175
3CIN A18 4.0M IHP Fischer5215615150
4CIN A18 4.0M CRC Husmann4313819164
5CIN A18 4.0M WIRC Bruner4312921172
6CIN A18 4.0M IUTC Piekarsky43111023187
7CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Singh43101124203
8CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Wilhite2481022161
9CIN A18 4.0M CRC Nelson1531530201
10CIN A18 4.0M WIRC Yang1641734227
11CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Lowery0741738240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bryce Hernly
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Bryce Sadler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Matthew Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.68
Damon Grothe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.65
Cliff Dickinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
JASON RICHMOND
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Micah MacKison
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Ramsaran Singh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Charles Hinkle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Denis Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Meyer + JASON RICHMOND5165% games+14.9% vs expected
JASON RICHMOND + Christopher Hines8356% games−2.1% vs expected
Cliff Dickinson + Ramsaran Singh7552% gamesnot enough data
Cliff Dickinson + JASON RICHMOND8173% gamesnot enough data
JASON RICHMOND + Damon Grothe4355% gamesnot enough data
Charles Hinkle + Cliff Dickinson5155% gamesnot enough data
Charles Hinkle + Christopher Hines4150% gamesnot enough data
Ramsaran Singh + JASON RICHMOND213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryce Hernly
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christopher Hines
55W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Bryce Sadler
37W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Matthew Meyer
66W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
3.5
Damon Grothe
122W–38L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.68
4
Cliff Dickinson
64W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
JASON RICHMOND
105W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Micah MacKison
28W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Ramsaran Singh
76W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Charles Hinkle
93W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Denis Ryan
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.