Teams

Redding 3.5 55 Wed

2023 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-03vs Chance 3.5 55 WedLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetty Haggard / Myra Propst vs Suzanne Johnson / Judy Eaton1-6, 1-6
2023-04-26vs Wilson 3.5 55 WedLost 01
L#2 DoublesBobbi McEntee / Betty Haggard vs Melinda Billings / Lauran Epstein6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-12vs Michaels 55s 3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesBetty Haggard / Myra Propst vs Jan Whittaker / Michelle Reece6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGladys Dunn / Bobbi McEntee vs Sherri Frazier / Lee Farley6-3, 6-3
2023-04-05vs Kirby 3.5 55 WedLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetty Haggard / Myra Propst vs Trisha Kirby / Kimberly Gay4-6, 3-6
2023-03-29vs Chance 3.5 55 WedLost 01
L#2 DoublesBobbi McEntee / Jill Elam vs Susan Calkins / Darci Gold1-6, 2-6
2023-03-22vs Wilson 3.5 55 WedLost 01
L#2 DoublesMyra Propst / Betty Haggard vs Karen Olson / Emily Wilson3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Gladys Dunn
published
3.24
Kathy Chinnis
published
3.19
Betsey Wells
published 3.5
2.97
Jill Elam
published
2.94
Betty Haggard
published 3.5
2.84
Sue White
published
2.84
Eleanor Redding
published
2.82
Linda Chapman
published
2.78
Cindy Wood
published 3
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Lydia Nadel
published
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
2.41
Bobbi McEntee
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue White + Gladys Dunn213 matchesnot enough data
Betsey Wells + Lydia Nadel123 matchesnot enough data
Eleanor Redding + Kathy Chinnis033 matchesnot enough data
Rose Chrismon + Kathy Chinnis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gladys Dunn
28W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Kathy Chinnis
17W–33L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Betsey Wells
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Jill Elam
19W–30L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–23L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94
Sue White
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
Eleanor Redding
5W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
Linda Chapman
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cindy Wood
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Myra Propst
146W–178L career · 8 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
Lydia Nadel
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47
3
Bobbi McEntee
87W–103L career · 7 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.