Teams

KC ORANGE

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-01vs SSLGT GREENWon 41
W#1 DoublesJody Dart / Terri Jennings vs Jeni Anderson / Gena Erwin6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNicole Manutes vs Sarah May6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnne Means / Susan Conroy vs Jan Bennett / Vicki Hasenzahl6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesFernanda Jacques vs Kristen Ryan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStacy Gregg / Denise van Essen vs Patty Weston / Valerie Norris6-3, 6-2
2021-05-25vs KC BRONZEWon 41
W#1 DoublesSusan Conroy / Anne Means vs Carole Dagnon / Jody Walker6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesFernanda Jacques vs Meghan Geisler7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTerri Jennings / Sarah Smith vs Alison Ellerbroek / Laura Grush5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNicole Manutes vs Jolein Harro6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiane Willoughby / Stacy Gregg vs Shannon Buhl / Kelly Lipsteuer6-0, 6-0
2021-05-24vs BCST REDWon 41
W#1 DoublesDebbie Lathrop / Sarah Smith vs Cheryl Grisar / Kathleen Krum6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNicole Manutes vs Kate Anderson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnita Burns / Stacy Gregg vs Molly Stensland / Julie Anderson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesFernanda Jacques vs Kristin Kottcamp6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDenise van Essen / Diane Willoughby vs Andrea Rowley / Marilee Yorchak4-6, 4-6
2021-05-18vs CCC REDWon 32
L#1 DoublesDebbie Lathrop / Sarah Smith vs Sandra Tate / Debbie McGough6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesFernanda Jacques vs Danielle Matsuyama5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJody Dart / Terri Jennings vs Andrea Sowitch / Tiernan McKay6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNicole Manutes vs Julianne Soler6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDenise van Essen / Anita Burns vs Kerri Luther / Kelly Weber6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-17vs SSLGT GREENWon 41
W#1 DoublesStacy Gregg / Anita Burns vs Jan Bennett / Susan Ducey7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesFernanda Jacques vs Kristen Ryan2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJody Dart / Terri Jennings vs Angie Lutterman / Jeni Anderson6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNicole Manutes vs Gena Erwin7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiane Willoughby / Denise van Essen vs Patty Weston / Valerie Norris5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-12vs PH TEALWon 32
L#1 DoublesTerri Jennings / Jody Dart vs Sandy McGregor / Julie Pontiff3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Manutes vs Lori Davis6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Conroy / Anne Means vs Carolyn Schilling / Ericka Beck4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDebbie Lathrop vs Jenny Kelly6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnita Burns / Sarah Smith vs Deanna Deorio / Casey Hemphill6-2, 6-2
2021-04-20vs KC BRONZEWon 50
W#1 DoublesJody Dart / Terri Jennings vs Laura Grush / Alison Ellerbroek6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNicole Manutes vs Meghan Geisler6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnne Means / Susan Conroy vs Meg Yarka / Carole Dagnon6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesFernanda Jacques vs Jolein Harro6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStacy Gregg / Anita Burns vs Kate LeClair / Kristi McLaughlin6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings59 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTA GREY703149214
2SSH GREY7031411210
3BTA ORANGE7029618267
4SSLT NAVY7026921256
5NJ BLACK6128718248
6MC RED6127821233
7SSLGT NAVY6126922225
8APR GREEN6126922261
9BM ORANGE6127824283
10CACM GREY61251025257
11NJ GREY61231232323
12GTC BLACK61211435321
13PRKR GOLD5123716208
14SSLT GREEN5123718200
15HRCA RED52221332290
16TTA RED52211435318
17KC GREEN52201536305
18BP ORANGE52181737298
19CM MAROON52191638308
20CR RED42181228273
21CACI RED42181230257
22RCC RED43171839320
23HW BLUE43191639322
24KC ORANGE43191639321
25GTC NAVY43191639338
26KC NAVY43171840326
27GLDN RED43161940300
28LTC GREEN43181742348
29HFII GREEN34191634276
30SKY SILVER34191635306
31GTC BLUE34181738319
32SSG BLUE34191638324
33SSH GREEN34122346348
34HRCA BLUE34142148341
35RRTC NAVY24121841305
36LTA RED25152041343
37KC GREY25161942313
38GAC GREY25152045335
39RHCC BLUE25161946352
40WC NAVY25142147363
41STAP BLUE25142147364
42KC BLUE25142148342
43HRCA BLACK25132249370
44EM RED25112452368
45BRMST MAROON25112453377
46CVTA BLUE25112454371
47LEBTC BLACK25102554367
48SSLT YELLOW25102558385
49SH BLUE1562448321
50MC GOLD16142146353
51BCC RED16112449351
52SKY MAROON16122349353
53KC SILVER16112451352
54WP ORANGE16112452365
55CVTA GREEN1692654362
56APR YELLOW1682759388
57CPV GREEN0652553334
58LTC RED0782757380
59NJ YELLOW0772858396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Debbie Lathrop
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Stacy Gregg
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Nicole Manutes
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4
Denise van Essen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Anita Burns
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Fernanda Jacques
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.52
Jody Dart
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.36
Diane Willoughby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Susan Conroy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Anne Means
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Terri Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Conroy + Debbie Lathrop11557% games+7.0% vs expected
Susan Conroy + Terri Jennings6263% games+5.0% vs expected
Nicole Manutes + Diane Willoughby3350% games+2.0% vs expected
Terri Jennings + Jody Dart321656% games+1.9% vs expected
Susan Conroy + Diane Willoughby3543% games+1.8% vs expected
Stacy Gregg + Jody Dart4358% games+1.6% vs expected
Stacy Gregg + Diane Willoughby3551% games+0.1% vs expected
Anne Means + Susan Conroy121050% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Debbie Lathrop
131W–80L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
4.12
4
Stacy Gregg
73W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Nicole Manutes
99W–31L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Denise van Essen
30W–24L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Anita Burns
70W–53L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Fernanda Jacques
42W–40L career · 6 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Jody Dart
111W–88L career · 5 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Diane Willoughby
34W–49L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
Susan Conroy
77W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Anne Means
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Terri Jennings
49W–23L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.