Teams

BCST RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-01vs KC BRONZEWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarilee Yorchak / Andrea Rowley vs Alison Ellerbroek / Laura Grush1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPam Gelwick / April O'Dell vs Elizabeth Pike / Jody Walker6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathleen Krum / Molly Beach vs Kelly Lipsteuer / Jolein Harro7-5, 7-6
2021-05-25vs PH TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Grisar / April O'Dell vs Sandy McGregor / Julie Pontiff7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBecky Theander / Kathleen Krum vs Jenny Kelly / Carolyn Schilling1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMolly Stensland / Bridget Schroder vs Sarah Brown / Gretchen Morrison4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-05-24vs KC ORANGELost 13
L#1 DoublesCheryl Grisar / Kathleen Krum vs Debbie Lathrop / Sarah Smith1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Stensland / Julie Anderson vs Anita Burns / Stacy Gregg2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKristin Kottcamp vs Fernanda Jacques2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Rowley / Marilee Yorchak vs Denise van Essen / Diane Willoughby6-4, 6-4
2021-05-18vs SSLGT GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesApril O'Dell / Kathleen Krum vs Patty Weston / Susan Ducey2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBridget Schroder / Pam Gelwick vs Angie Lutterman / Jeni Anderson1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKristin Kottcamp vs Kristen Ryan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Anderson / Molly Beach vs Gena Erwin / Jan Bennett7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-14vs CCC REDLost 23
W#1 DoublesCheryl Grisar / Molly Stensland vs Julianne Soler / Debbie McGough6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristin Kottcamp vs Sandra Tate5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPam Gelwick / April O'Dell vs Jennifer Seifert / Kerri Luther2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAndrea Rowley vs Valere Mathis6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBecky Theander / Molly Beach vs Danielle Matsuyama / Jennifer Gilliland4-6, 2-6
2021-05-10vs KC BRONZELost 23
W#1 DoublesApril O'Dell / Julie Anderson vs Elizabeth Pike / Kate LeClair6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristin Kottcamp vs Meghan Geisler6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCheryl Grisar / Bridget Schroder vs Jody Walker / Carole Dagnon3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAndrea Rowley vs Alison Ellerbroek6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBecky Theander / Marilee Yorchak vs Shannon Buhl / Kelly Lipsteuer3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-04-29vs PH TEALLost 04
L#1 DoublesMarilee Yorchak / Pam Gelwick vs Sandy McGregor / Aree Bly1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Stensland / Bridget Schroder vs Ericka Beck / Carolyn Schilling7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKristin Kottcamp vs Gretchen Morrison7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMolly Beach / Becky Theander vs Deanna Deorio / Casey Hemphill2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Cheryl Grisar
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.95
Kristin Kottcamp
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.18
Molly Beach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
April O'Dell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Andrea Rowley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Becky Theander
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Bridget Schroder
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kathleen Krum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Marilee Yorchak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Molly Stensland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Pam Gelwick
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridget Schroder + Molly Stensland3346% games−0.2% vs expected
Marilee Yorchak + Pam Gelwick033 matchesnot enough data
Bridget Schroder + Andrea Rowley123 matchesnot enough data
April O'Dell + Kathleen Krum123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Grisar
61W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Kristin Kottcamp
88W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.95
Molly Beach
19W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
April O'Dell
14W–25L career · 5 lines in 2021
83%17%<1%
2.88
Andrea Rowley
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Becky Theander
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Bridget Schroder
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Krum
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marilee Yorchak
3W–16L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Molly Stensland
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Pam Gelwick
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.