Teams

SSLGT GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-01vs KC ORANGELost 04
L#1 DoublesJeni Anderson / Gena Erwin vs Jody Dart / Terri Jennings0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSarah May vs Nicole Manutes3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJan Bennett / Vicki Hasenzahl vs Anne Means / Susan Conroy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatty Weston / Valerie Norris vs Stacy Gregg / Denise van Essen3-6, 2-6
2021-05-25vs CCC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGena Erwin / Susan Ducey vs Debbie McGough / Julianne Soler7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah May vs Rebecca Shefte6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPatty Weston / Valerie Norris vs Jennifer Seifert / Kelly Weber5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Lutterman / Jeni Anderson vs Jennifer Gilliland / Carla Buretz0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-18vs BCST REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesPatty Weston / Susan Ducey vs April O'Dell / Kathleen Krum6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSarah May vs Kate Anderson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAngie Lutterman / Jeni Anderson vs Bridget Schroder / Pam Gelwick6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGena Erwin / Jan Bennett vs Julie Anderson / Molly Beach6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-17vs KC ORANGELost 04
L#1 DoublesJan Bennett / Susan Ducey vs Stacy Gregg / Anita Burns5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Lutterman / Jeni Anderson vs Jody Dart / Terri Jennings4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesGena Erwin vs Nicole Manutes5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatty Weston / Valerie Norris vs Diane Willoughby / Denise van Essen7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2021-05-11vs PH TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesAngie Lutterman / Jeni Anderson vs Aree Bly / Sandy McGregor2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGena Erwin / Patty Weston vs Deanna Deorio / Casey Hemphill4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSarah May vs Ericka Beck0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJan Bennett / Valerie Norris vs Gretchen Morrison / Sarah Brown1-6, 6-7
2021-05-04vs KC BRONZEWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan Ducey / Patty Weston vs Carole Dagnon / Jody Walker4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJan Bennett / Valerie Norris vs Kate LeClair / Meg Yarka3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesSarah May vs Jolein Harro6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJeni Anderson / Angie Lutterman vs Kelly Lipsteuer / Shannon Buhl6-0, 6-0
2021-04-29vs CCC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesAngie Lutterman / Jeni Anderson vs Andrea Sowitch / Rebecca Shefte6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGena Erwin / Susan Ducey vs Kerri Luther / Kerry Barker5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJan Bennett vs Tiernan McKay2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPatty Weston / Valerie Norris vs Jennifer Gilliland / Danielle Matsuyama4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP BLUE7029615226
2DTC SILVER7029617226
3CACM YELLOW52241124256
4SKY GOLD52221331291
5CVTA GREY42181231277
6GAC SILVER33201023228
7LTFC ORANGE33171331266
8LTA BLACK33151536299
9CACI NAVY24102042326
10RHCC GOLD25161945334
11SSLGT GREEN25142151374
12STAP BLACK25102552362
13RRTC RED0672350327

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Angie Lutterman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Gena Erwin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Sarah May
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.37
Valerie Norris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Jan Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Patty Weston
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kristen Ryan
published
Susan Ducey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Vicki Hasenzahl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Norris + Susan Ducey4157% games+8.9% vs expected
Patty Weston + Susan Ducey4344% games+0.9% vs expected
Valerie Norris + Jan Bennett2447% games+0.6% vs expected
Gena Erwin + Susan Ducey3549% games−1.8% vs expected
Valerie Norris + Patty Weston171851% games−2.4% vs expected
Patty Weston + Gena Erwin224 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Norris + Gena Erwin213 matchesnot enough data
Patty Weston + Angie Lutterman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Lutterman
15W–26L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Gena Erwin
44W–51L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Sarah May
13W–18L career · 5 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Valerie Norris
43W–48L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Jan Bennett
57W–79L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
Patty Weston
32W–37L career · 7 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Kristen Ryan
16W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Ducey
25W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Vicki Hasenzahl
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.