Teams

Forever Smashed

2026 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.46 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-09-03vs Vintage VolleyersWon 20
W#2 DoublesMargaret Burke / Suzanne Malmstrom vs Jan Ingelstrom-Stewart / Dawn Collias6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesShannon Page / Adrianne Fisher vs Tina Measham / Mary Adcox6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-09-01vs Tie BreakersLost 02
L#2 DoublesAdrianne Fisher / Sue Beck vs Kathy Hansen / Chureena Looney6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMargot Gilna / Kathne Morrell vs Sherry Hamilton / Teresa McDonald4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-27vs Doubles or Nothin'Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Malmstrom / Margaret Burke vs Bonnie Stotland / Cathy Adams1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAdrianne Fisher / Sue Beck vs Elaine Remley / Leanne Town6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRoxy Therrien / Shannon Page vs Vicki Flume / Linda Butler4-6, 5-7
2026-08-25vs Vintage VolleyersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMargaret Burke / Angela Oddonetto vs Mary Chodroff / Debbie Davies4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKathne Morrell / Margot Gilna vs Jan Ingelstrom-Stewart / Tina Measham6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Tie BreakersLost 03
L#1 DoublesSue Beck / Mary Stone-Arave vs Michele Inghram / Janet Wilson4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMargaret Burke / Adrianne Fisher vs Ellen Kennedy / Trang Pham3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRosa Carnot / Kathne Morrell vs Jennifer Colson / Kathy Hansen1-6, 1-6
2026-08-18vs Doubles or Nothin'Won 30
W#1 DoublesSue Beck / Adrianne Fisher vs Susi Keeth / Bonnie Stotland6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargot Gilna / Kathne Morrell vs Cathy Adams / Eva VanCuren3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Burke / Angela Oddonetto vs Elaine Remley / Leanne Town6-3, 6-3
2026-08-15vs Vintage VolleyersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSue Beck / Mary Stone-Arave vs Dawn Collias / Vicki Osweiler3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-06vs Doubles or Nothin'Split 11
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Malmstrom / Angela Oddonetto vs Bonnie Stotland / Cathy Adams6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSue Beck / Mary Stone-Arave vs Trudy Fouser / Susi Keeth2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tie Breakers401027104
2Doubles or Nothin'133919129
3Forever Smashed02241069

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jenny Grunke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Margot Gilna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Suzanne Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.34
Mary Stone-Arave
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Shannon Page
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Suzanne Malmstrom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Adrianne Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Angela Oddonetto
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Margaret Burke
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Roxy Therrien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.81
Rosa Carnot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Kathne Morrell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Sue Beck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roxy Therrien + Margaret Burke2739% games+1.2% vs expected
Margaret Burke + Rosa Carnot6262% games+0.5% vs expected
Kathne Morrell + Margot Gilna14555% games+0.2% vs expected
Suzanne Malmstrom + Margaret Burke9852% games−2.1% vs expected
Rosa Carnot + Kathne Morrell1839% games−10.4% vs expected
Shannon Page + Roxy Therrien4844% gamesnot enough data
Mary Stone-Arave + Rosa Carnot4747% gamesnot enough data
Mary Stone-Arave + Sue Beck2736% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jenny Grunke
168W–148L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Margot Gilna
85W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
3
Suzanne Thomas
75W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
3.5
Mary Stone-Arave
26W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Shannon Page
23W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Suzanne Malmstrom
108W–112L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Adrianne Fisher
85W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Angela Oddonetto
4W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Margaret Burke
50W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Roxy Therrien
63W–80L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Rosa Carnot
40W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Kathne Morrell
47W–84L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Sue Beck
3W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.