Teams

6VTC-HAESSLER 35 W/E WOMEN SINGLES SEM F1

2022 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 SinglesAnne Cowan vs Katie Sandison3-6, 4-5
W#2 SinglesZorica Reic vs Frances Carlson7-5, 4-1
L#3 SinglesJessica Haessler vs Amelia Manley1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Cowan vs Nori Flautner1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLisa Endres vs Gonjoo Jung3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJessica Haessler vs Amelia Manley1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAbby Mercatante vs Jean Wang5-7, 2-2
W#2 SinglesLisa Endres vs Nathalie Vandecan6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRuth Le vs Cindy Stevens6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesZorica Reic vs Janya Somers6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLisa Hutton vs Nanette O'Brien6-0, 4-2
L#1 SinglesRuth Le vs Sara Chang1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLisa Endres vs Elizabeth Shadigian7-5
W#3 SinglesLori Sella-Armstrong vs Kristin Rusche-Leone3-6, 5-1
L#1 SinglesLisa Hutton vs Jean Wang1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesZorica Reic vs Sanne Krummel6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLori Sella-Armstrong vs Nathalie Vandecan2-6, 6-5
L#1 SinglesAbby Mercatante vs Susi Shaw7-6, 0-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRuth Le vs Marci Walker2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesLisa Hutton vs Cindy Stevens6-3, 4-5
W#1 SinglesAnne Cowan vs Becky Cleason6-4, 4-3
W#2 SinglesJessica Haessler vs Beverly Ulrich6-3, 4-1
L#3 SinglesLori Sella-Armstrong vs Pamela Cliff6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Abby Mercatante
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.44
Anne Cowan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Lori Sella-Armstrong
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Ruth Le
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.22
Lisa Hutton
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.85
Jessica Haessler
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Lisa Endres
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Zorica Reic
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Hutton + Jessica Haessler141250% games+0.2% vs expected
Lisa Endres + Lisa Hutton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abby Mercatante
47W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anne Cowan
116W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Lori Sella-Armstrong
113W–137L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Ruth Le
41W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Lisa Hutton
124W–118L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Jessica Haessler
117W–128L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Lisa Endres
39W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Zorica Reic
67W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.