Teams

3LIB-MARLEY 35 W/E WOMEN SINGLES SEM F1

2022 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesKatie Sandison vs Anne Cowan6-3, 5-4
L#2 SinglesFrances Carlson vs Zorica Reic5-7, 1-4
W#3 SinglesAmelia Manley vs Jessica Haessler6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNori Flautner vs Anne Cowan6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesGonjoo Jung vs Lisa Endres6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAmelia Manley vs Jessica Haessler6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLynn Henry vs Sara Chang6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAmelia Manley vs Elizabeth Caswell7-5, 2-3
W#3 SinglesHanna Song vs Beverly Ulrich6-4, 2-3
W#1 SinglesKaori Neubauer vs Sanne Krummel6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesGonjoo Jung vs Nathalie Vandecan6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAvery McLeod vs Jane Tucker6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristine Kim vs Susi Shaw0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJulia Owens vs Cindy Stevens6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHanna Song vs Janya Somers6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Sandison vs Elizabeth Shadigian6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAvery McLeod vs Beverly Ulrich6-4, 3-1
W#3 SinglesJulia Owens vs Jeanie Dodge6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKaori Neubauer vs Maribel Weitz6-4, 4-3
W#2 SinglesVivian Marley vs Joy Fried6-2, 4-5
W#3 SinglesAvery McLeod vs Nathalie Vandecan5-7, 4-0
W#1 SinglesLynn Henry vs Nanette O'Brien6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKatie Sandison vs Zhen Edelman6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesNori Flautner vs Marilyn Woolfolk6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Avery McLeod
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.83
Katie Sandison
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Amelia Manley
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.74
Frances Carlson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Gonjoo Jung
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.48
Eira Duran
published 4
3.25
Kaori Neubauer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Christine Kim
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Hanna Song
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Vivian Marley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Julia Owens
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Lynn Henry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Nori Flautner
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vivian Marley + Julia Owens4258% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Avery McLeod
54W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Katie Sandison
103W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Amelia Manley
60W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Frances Carlson
144W–64L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Gonjoo Jung
146W–117L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Eira Duran
148W–66L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Kaori Neubauer
78W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Christine Kim
40W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Hanna Song
89W–146L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Vivian Marley
107W–94L career · 1 line in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.93
Julia Owens
48W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Henry
42W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nori Flautner
37W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.