Teams

Marco YMCA - Schaufus

2024 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#3 DoublesAna Cecilia Isaza / Megan Zimmerman vs Vivian Wong / Jane Doe6-1, 6-1
2024-04-30vs Heritage Bay - K. KeillorLost 01
L#1 DoublesAna Cecilia Isaza / Susan Juels vs Mary Huber-Olk / Cheryl Copps4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-23vs Isles Of Collier - M. YoungWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoyce Hail / Pattie Yergler vs Marlea Bowser / Adrienne Woodward6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-16vs Valencia Bonita - GredingerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAna Cecilia Isaza / Joyce Hail vs Lorraine Steuerer / Bobbi Burnett2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-02vs Fiddlers Creek - FioreLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoyce Hail / Ana Cecilia Isaza vs Mary Nunez / Megan Millard2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-03-26vs Marco Ymca - ConteWon 10
W#2 DoublesPattie Yergler / Joyce Hail vs Janet Oliver / Celia Bolzani6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Sarah Griffin
published
3.49
Inge Lund
published
3.46
Ana Cecilia Isaza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Karen Correa
published
3.31
Susan Juels
published
3.29
Deb Dorsey
published 3.5
3.27
Laura Murphy
published
3.23
Linda Streett
published
3.21
Pattie Yergler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Jodi Schaufus
published
3.03
Joyce Hail
published
2.69
Maria Oddy
published
2.60
Laura Hansmann
published
KAREN COBIN
published
Noreen Novak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pattie Yergler + Karen Correa7749% games+2.0% vs expected
Linda Streett + Laura Murphy5650% games−0.6% vs expected
Pattie Yergler + Ana Cecilia Isaza16263% gamesnot enough data
Karen Correa + Deb Dorsey134 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Schaufus + Deb Dorsey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Griffin
70W–40L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
Inge Lund
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Ana Cecilia Isaza
200W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Karen Correa
15W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Susan Juels
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Deb Dorsey
35W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Laura Murphy
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Linda Streett
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Pattie Yergler
220W–127L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Jodi Schaufus
23W–19L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Joyce Hail
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Maria Oddy
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.69
Laura Hansmann
13W–26L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.60
KAREN COBIN
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Noreen Novak
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.