Teams

ACAC Stephens

2022 Richmond Mixed 55 & Over · Richmond Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-15vs MTC McElgunnWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Johnson / Jeanette Kim vs Lewis Farinholt / Susan Zielinski6-3, 6-1
2022-07-27vs Avalon MihalkoLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeanette Kim / Jeffrey Johnson vs Nancy Mihalko / Robert Calhoun6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-14vs Willow Oaks KellyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Foddrell / Jeanette Kim vs Kim Boys / Meda Lane6-1, 6-2
2022-06-16vs Avalon MihalkoLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanette Kim / Tracy Marks vs Betsy Siewers / Brad Williamson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Anant Singh
published 3.5
3.29
Jeffrey Foddrell
published
3.29
Diane Linderman
published 3.5
3.28
Jeffrey Johnson
published
Jeanette Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Joseph Cipolla
published
3.15
Tracy Marks
published
3.12
Kathie Naylor
published
3.10
Dawn MacHonis
published 3.5
3.00
Joanne Wilson
published
2.84
Valerie Stephens
published 3
2.80
Margaret Peters
published
2.70
Andrew Gillies
published 3
Jennifer Cubitt
published
Scott McFadden
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anant Singh
33W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Jeffrey Foddrell
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Diane Linderman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Jeffrey Johnson
23W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Jeanette Kim
203W–155L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Cipolla
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
Kathie Naylor
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Dawn MacHonis
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Joanne Wilson
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Valerie Stephens
125W–104L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Margaret Peters
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Andrew Gillies
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.70
Jennifer Cubitt
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott McFadden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.