Teams

Clancy 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs AM

2023 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women 40 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-08-31vs Terrell 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs AMLost 01
L#3 DoublesDebbie Clancy / Brenda Varner vs Lori Harrington / Claire Driscoll2-6, 3-6
2023-08-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Varner / Andrea Sweat vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Stephanie Bettinger
published
3.69
Julie Dover
published
3.53
Teresa Cruz
published
3.51
Casey Emmendorfer
published 3.5
3.49
Andrea Sweat
published 3.5
3.46
Elisabeth Kraska
published 3.5
3.38
Debbie Clancy
published 3.5
3.26
Judy Thomas
published
3.18
Britt Molitoris
published 3.5
3.16
Amy Bunch
published 3.5
3.08
Sonia Haslam
published
2.86
Brenda Varner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Julie Streng
published
Jamie Cunningham
published 3
2.73
Jennifer M Riley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Clancy + Teresa Cruz5358% games+7.3% vs expected
Elisabeth Kraska + Stephanie Bettinger4356% games+2.8% vs expected
Elisabeth Kraska + Casey Emmendorfer404 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Clancy + Casey Emmendorfer213 matchesnot enough data
Sonia Haslam + Amy Bunch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Bettinger
26W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Julie Dover
41W–22L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Teresa Cruz
28W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Casey Emmendorfer
46W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Andrea Sweat
26W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Elisabeth Kraska
44W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Debbie Clancy
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Judy Thomas
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Britt Molitoris
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Amy Bunch
31W–36L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Sonia Haslam
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Brenda Varner
138W–88L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
2.86
Julie Streng
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Jamie Cunningham
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer M Riley
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.