Teams

Schenk 6.0

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Women 6.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-20vs Oliver 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesNadine Ball / Kim Worton vs Karren Trimp / Kimberly Wilson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Ballou / Roberta Jordan vs Linda Hawley / Joyce Smith6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVicki Krogstrand / Irene Rindfleisch vs Jennifer Keefe / Debbie Vande Kamp6-4, 6-0
2024-06-18vs Oliver 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesVicki Krogstrand / Roberta Jordan vs Jennifer Keefe / Sharon Oliver6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLori Troyer / Ann Schenk vs Karren Trimp / Kimberly Wilson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Baker / Irene Rindfleisch vs Debbie Vande Kamp / Linda Hawley6-1, 6-1
2024-06-12vs Oliver 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesChristi Ball / Nadine Ball vs Alyce Brown / Sharon Oliver6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIrene Rindfleisch / Marie Parkinson vs Jennifer Keefe / Karren Trimp6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBarbara Baker / Lori Troyer vs Susan Binns / Debbie Vande Kamp6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-10vs Oliver 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Baker / Marie Parkinson vs Jennifer Keefe / Karren Trimp7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVicki Krogstrand / Kim Worton vs Susan Binns / Shirlee Robertson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristi Ball / Irene Rindfleisch vs Joyce Smith / Kimberly Wilson6-1, 6-2
2024-06-06vs Oliver 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Ballou / Marie Parkinson vs Shirlee Robertson / Kimberly Wilson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNadine Ball / Roberta Jordan vs Sharon Oliver / Joyce Smith6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Baker / Irene Rindfleisch vs Linda Hawley / Debbie Vande Kamp6-0, 6-0
2024-06-04vs Oliver 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesNadine Ball / Roberta Jordan vs Susan Binns / Kimberly Wilson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Worton / Kristin Ballou vs Alyce Brown / Sharon Oliver7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLori Troyer / Christi Ball vs Jennifer Keefe / Debbie Vande Kamp3-6, 1-6
2024-05-31vs Oliver 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Ballou / Marie Parkinson vs Alyce Brown / Sharon Oliver6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Worton / Ann Schenk vs Jennifer Keefe / Shirlee Robertson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristi Ball / Roberta Jordan vs Susan Binns / Linda Hawley4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 6.0 - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Schenk 6.0701928113
2Oliver 550721939240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Nadine Ball
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Ann Schenk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Marie Parkinson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Barbara Baker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Irene Rindfleisch
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.52
Christi Ball
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Kim Worton
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Kristin Ballou
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lori Troyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roberta Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Vicki Krogstrand
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nadine Ball + Vicki Krogstrand3251% games+2.0% vs expected
Marie Parkinson + Barbara Baker9457% games−0.8% vs expected
Marie Parkinson + Irene Rindfleisch3544% games−2.6% vs expected
Irene Rindfleisch + Barbara Baker6846% games−15.6% vs expected
Nadine Ball + Barbara Baker5548% gamesnot enough data
Nadine Ball + Christi Ball3251% gamesnot enough data
Marie Parkinson + Kristin Ballou404 matchesnot enough data
Marie Parkinson + Vicki Krogstrand224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Nadine Ball
86W–110L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Ann Schenk
16W–32L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Marie Parkinson
61W–79L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Barbara Baker
65W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Irene Rindfleisch
32W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
2.56
3
Christi Ball
59W–121L career · 4 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
Kim Worton
7W–4L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristin Ballou
23W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Troyer
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Roberta Jordan
20W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vicki Krogstrand
37W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.