Teams

CDTA S A18W3.0 3Centennial Tromp Mon 7 $20

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

18 players · average NTRP 3.10 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesDiana Atad / Michelle Yeh vs Nikki Veen / Leslie Brosk6-7, 3-5
L#2 DoublesBeth Goldberg / Mary Kaczmarek vs Kathryn Lentz / Dana Anderson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Yeh / Simone Brown vs Amanda Ripp / Lori Guba6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGunyoung Lee vs Jacqueline Deberry6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Charpentier / Mary Kaczmarek vs Elizabeth Dasso / Joni Kane5-7, 4-5
L#1 DoublesChris Henderson / Simone Brown vs Sharon Snyder / Jacqueline Lakely2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Goldberg / Shelby Hasten vs Anne Lewis / Catherine Lange3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMary Kaczmarek vs Tara Snow4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGunyoung Lee vs Nicole Koleno6-7, 3-2
W#3 DoublesShelby Hasten / Erin McCarthy vs Kim Vandegrift / Jean Niemi6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-01vs CDTA S A18W3.0 1XS Charles Sun 3 $22Split 11
L#1 DoublesChris Henderson / Simone Brown vs Michelle Charles / Dina DeLaurentis5-7, 5-4
W#3 DoublesRenee Lanam / Shelby Hasten vs Denise Jordan / Lindsay Angyus6-1, 6-0
2025-05-18vs CDTA S A18W3.0 1XS Charles Sun 3 $22Split 11
W#1 SinglesGunyoung Lee vs Jessica Hutchins6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Goldberg / Shelby Hasten vs Valerie Harris / Angela Smyth5-7, 4-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKelli Brinkman / Michelle Yeh vs Jody Sternberg / Shelly Costabile6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSimone Brown / Diana Atad vs Julie Gordon / Colleen Liotine5-7, 3-5
W#3 DoublesBeth Goldberg / Lisa Charpentier vs Aimee Hombach / Aubrey Ellis6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W3.0 2MT Chi Brown-1 Sun 2 $31.573331741342
2CDTA S A18W3.0 3Centennial Tromp Mon 7 $2063281740350
3CDTA S A18W3.0 8MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $2764272350409
4CDTA S A18W3.0 5Lake Bluff Sherman Sun 4 $2264272351362
5CDTA S A18W3.0 7MT Pal Snyder Thu 7 $2664232760438
6CDTA S A18W3.0 9LifeSport (OUT) Kiernan Sat 9 $2554242144382
7CDTA S A18W3.0 4Centennial Cohen Sun 3 $2046252555413
8CDTA S A18W3.0 1XS Charles Sun 3 $2227153063425
9CDTA S A18W3.0 6MT Chi Brown-2 Sun 6 $31.518103572433

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Claire Tramm
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.28
Jeanne Tromp
published 3.5
3.24
Kelli Brinkman
published 3.5
3.08
Lelia Lanuza
published 3
3.05
Gunyoung Lee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.05
Michelle Yeh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Christie Jordan
published 3
2.96
Meg Hui
published 3
2.92
Nora Jewett
published 3
2.89
Simone Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Diana Atad
published 3
2.76
Lisa Charpentier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Beth Goldberg
published 3
Chris Henderson
published 3
2.55
Mary Kaczmarek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.44
Renee Lanam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Erin McCarthy
published
Shelby Hasten
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lelia Lanuza + Simone Brown6080% games+18.2% vs expected
Lelia Lanuza + Christie Jordan10264% games+6.9% vs expected
Diana Atad + Simone Brown7358% games+3.9% vs expected
Diana Atad + Jeanne Tromp5356% games+3.9% vs expected
Kelli Brinkman + Nora Jewett8362% games+2.5% vs expected
Michelle Yeh + Kelli Brinkman6756% games+2.0% vs expected
Lisa Charpentier + Simone Brown4351% games−2.5% vs expected
Renee Lanam + Jeanne Tromp3348% games−7.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Claire Tramm
29W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Kelli Brinkman
45W–18L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Lelia Lanuza
32W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Gunyoung Lee
16W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Michelle Yeh
68W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Christie Jordan
84W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Meg Hui
71W–58L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Nora Jewett
37W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Simone Brown
44W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Diana Atad
105W–88L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Lisa Charpentier
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Beth Goldberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chris Henderson
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Kaczmarek
18W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Renee Lanam
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Erin McCarthy
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelby Hasten
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.