Teams

CDTA S A18W3.0 7MT Pal Snyder Thu 7 $26

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#2 DoublesAnne Lewis / Catherine Lange vs Cathy Silvis / Joni Kane3-6, 2-4
L#3 DoublesStefanie Zirkelbach / Miriam Wozniewski vs Kate Hosteny / Abbey Peters2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesStefanie Zirkelbach / Catherine Lange vs Maria Unwala / Joni Kane7-5, 6-3
L#1 DoublesAnne Lewis / Catherine Lange vs Elham Abboud / Juli Theo4-6, 1-4
W#2 DoublesSharon Snyder / Miriam Wozniewski vs Pamela Sherman / Samantha Garrity6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKristin Lordahl vs Kristen Smith6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStefanie Zirkelbach / Tara Snow vs Jennifer Scroggins / Jenna Stanley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Lewis / Catherine Lange vs Beth Goldberg / Shelby Hasten6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMiriam Wozniewski / Tanja Vukasin vs Denise Jordan / Brenda Nelson6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKristin Lordahl vs Emma Lee6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStefanie Zirkelbach / Cherrie Han vs Aimee Hombach / Stephanie Rosenberg6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTara Snow / Miriam Wozniewski vs Amy Shappert / Sydney Zusman3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesSharon Snyder / Catherine Lange vs Amanda Ripp / Samantha Warner6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStefanie Zirkelbach / Jacqueline Lakely vs Allison Cohen / Leena Bhat6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKristin Lordahl vs Laurie Woolverton6-4, 6-0
W#1 DoublesCatherine Lange / Anne Lewis vs Lindsay Miller / Ally Alston6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Lakely / Kristin Lordahl vs Molly Klein Catalano / Kelly Superczynski6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesAnne Lewis / Catherine Lange vs ELIZABETH BULF / Frances Hopps7-6, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W3.0 2MT Chi Brown-1 Sun 2 $31.573331741342
2CDTA S A18W3.0 3Centennial Tromp Mon 7 $2063281740350
3CDTA S A18W3.0 8MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $2764272350409
4CDTA S A18W3.0 5Lake Bluff Sherman Sun 4 $2264272351362
5CDTA S A18W3.0 7MT Pal Snyder Thu 7 $2664232760438
6CDTA S A18W3.0 9LifeSport (OUT) Kiernan Sat 9 $2554242144382
7CDTA S A18W3.0 4Centennial Cohen Sun 3 $2046252555413
8CDTA S A18W3.0 1XS Charles Sun 3 $2227153063425
9CDTA S A18W3.0 6MT Chi Brown-2 Sun 6 $31.518103572433

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Sharon Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
3.03
Anne Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.97
Stefanie Zirkelbach
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Catherine Lange
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.82
Tara Snow
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.81
Kristin Lordahl
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Cherrie Han
published 3
2.76
Kelleen Thut
published 3
2.70
Vanessa Harris
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Laurie Pereira
published
Maryanne Petritis
published
Miriam Wozniewski
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tanja Vukasin
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherrie Han + Stefanie Zirkelbach7166% games+16.9% vs expected
Kelleen Thut + Catherine Lange202748% games+14.1% vs expected
Jacqueline Lakely + Tara Snow11760% games+13.0% vs expected
Jacqueline Lakely + Sharon Snyder181454% games+12.0% vs expected
Sharon Snyder + Anne Lewis5153% games+8.6% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Jacqueline Lakely5646% games+1.3% vs expected
Catherine Lange + Anne Lewis13361% games+0.9% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Tara Snow2641% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Snyder
94W–93L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
3
Jacqueline Lakely
57W–54L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Anne Lewis
60W–80L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Stefanie Zirkelbach
24W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Catherine Lange
71W–56L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Tara Snow
32W–41L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Kristin Lordahl
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Cherrie Han
74W–97L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Kelleen Thut
65W–104L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Vanessa Harris
21W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Holly Cooper-Belconis
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Pereira
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maryanne Petritis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Miriam Wozniewski
32W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanja Vukasin
6W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.