Teams

CDTA S A18W3.0 5Lake Bluff Sherman Sun 4 $22

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-27vs CDTA S A18W3.0 1XS Charles Sun 3 $22Split 11
W#1 SinglesNicole Koleno vs Jingwen Tang6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMargaret Keane / Michelle Frankovich vs Mariana Ingersoll / Marcia Proffitt-Florence6-7, 2-5
L#1 DoublesSamantha Garrity / Julie Bell vs Nikki Veen / Kathryn Lentz4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Koleno vs Karla Gidwani6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJulie Bell vs Ally Alston3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNicole Koleno vs Ginny Lazarus2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Bell / Jenna Stanley vs Sheila Henretta / Sarah Leonard6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Scroggins / Jenna Stanley vs Stefanie Zirkelbach / Tara Snow6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNicole Koleno vs Gunyoung Lee6-7, 3-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Scroggins / Pamela Sherman vs Diana Atad / Chris Henderson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJulie Bell / Maribeth Corbett vs ELIZABETH BULF / Ginny Lazarus2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesNicole Koleno vs Samantha Warner3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Sherman / Rina Norris vs Lori Guba / Beth Horowitz Steel7-5, 2-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W3.0 2MT Chi Brown-1 Sun 2 $31.573331741342
2CDTA S A18W3.0 3Centennial Tromp Mon 7 $2063281740350
3CDTA S A18W3.0 8MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $2764272350409
4CDTA S A18W3.0 5Lake Bluff Sherman Sun 4 $2264272351362
5CDTA S A18W3.0 7MT Pal Snyder Thu 7 $2664232760438
6CDTA S A18W3.0 9LifeSport (OUT) Kiernan Sat 9 $2554242144382
7CDTA S A18W3.0 4Centennial Cohen Sun 3 $2046252555413
8CDTA S A18W3.0 1XS Charles Sun 3 $2227153063425
9CDTA S A18W3.0 6MT Chi Brown-2 Sun 6 $31.518103572433

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Nicole Koleno
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Laura Breakstone
published 3
3.01
Maribeth Corbett
published 3
3.00
Juli Theo
published 3
2.91
Kim Vandegrift
published 3
2.90
2.90
Elham Abboud
published 3
2.90
Samantha Garrity
published 3
2.80
Pamela Sherman
published 3
2.80
Julie Bell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Jean Niemi
published 3
2.77
Jamie Rauscher
published 3
2.76
Karen Kos
published 3
2.74
Michelle Frankovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Jennifer Scroggins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Margaret Keane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jenna Stanley
published
Laura Gordon
published
Rina Norris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elham Abboud + Juli Theo7168% games+16.5% vs expected
Jennifer Scroggins + Jenna Stanley7353% games+12.5% vs expected
Samantha Garrity + Laura Breakstone12262% games+10.5% vs expected
Samantha Garrity + Jennifer Scroggins7066% games+9.8% vs expected
Laura Breakstone + Julie Bell10461% games+9.6% vs expected
Maribeth Corbett + Julie Bell9753% games+7.8% vs expected
Elham Abboud + Jennifer Scroggins2456% games+6.6% vs expected
Juli Theo + Maribeth Corbett13760% games+4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Koleno
57W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Laura Breakstone
78W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Maribeth Corbett
52W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Juli Theo
76W–49L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Kim Vandegrift
71W–69L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Amanda Marijanovic
61W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Elham Abboud
76W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Samantha Garrity
78W–56L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Pamela Sherman
71W–54L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
Julie Bell
40W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Jean Niemi
41W–43L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Jamie Rauscher
45W–33L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Karen Kos
37W–38L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Michelle Frankovich
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Jennifer Scroggins
35W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Margaret Keane
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
2.61
Jenna Stanley
32W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Gordon
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rina Norris
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.