Teams

Snowy Shots

2025 Winter Blast Doubles · Women 3.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2025-02-06vs Love Lobs...Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMindy Murray / Rhonda Kiser vs Taylor Austin / Sondra Simmons2-6, 0-6
2025-02-04vs HAPPY FEETWon 10
W#1 DoublesRhonda Kiser / Mindy Murray vs Oksana Lackey / Kelly Meier6-3, 6-3
2025-02-03vs Snow SmashersWon 10
W#1 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Mindy Murray vs Harlee Summers / Laura Barrett6-0, 6-0
2025-01-28vs All the Jingle LadiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Mindy Murray vs Linda Schultz / Paula Oliver6-1, 6-1
2025-01-27vs Cold PlayWon 10
W#1 DoublesMindy Murray / Natalie von Allmen vs Ashley Stahlschmidt / Richelle Connor6-0, 6-4
2025-01-26vs Deucey LuceysWon 10
W#1 DoublesRhonda Kiser / Mindy Murray vs Vale Biddix / Michelle Huffman6-3, 7-5
2025-01-09vs Snow AngelsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Mindy Murray vs Beth Blair / Amy Winfield7-6, 7-5
2025-01-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Mindy Murray vs Susan Davis / Beth Martin6-2, 6-1
2024-12-23vs Deuce BabyWon 10
W#1 DoublesRhonda Kiser / Natalie von Allmen vs Amy Harline / Anna Shamsnia6-2, 6-1
2024-12-21vs Yule LoseWon 10
W#1 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Rhonda Kiser vs Lauren Everley / Stacie Howard6-4, 6-2
2024-12-04vs CharelynWon 10
W#1 DoublesMindy Murray / Natalie von Allmen vs Jennifer Mcmillan / Paris Sellers6-2, 6-1
2024-11-26vs Comin in HotWon 10
W#1 DoublesMindy Murray / Natalie von Allmen vs Karen Shokes / Shannon Fuller6-4, 7-5
2024-11-21vs Hot ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Natalie von Allmen vs Angie Aycock / Jennifer Parker6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Mindy Murray
published
3.06
Aleshia Abernathy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Natalie von Allmen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Rhonda Kiser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie von Allmen + Aleshia Abernathy16855% games−1.8% vs expected
Aleshia Abernathy + Rhonda Kiser342853% games−2.2% vs expected
Aleshia Abernathy + Mindy Murray224 matchesnot enough data
Natalie von Allmen + Rhonda Kiser123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mindy Murray
13W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Aleshia Abernathy
165W–131L career · 10 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Natalie von Allmen
190W–106L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Rhonda Kiser
170W–115L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.