Teams

YMCA PRESIDIO 40AW4.0A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesSerene Lai / Robin Tognetti vs Privina Sexton / Jennifer Skarakis6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKai Tan / Serene Lai vs Diane Currie / Melanie Smith4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesVictoria Leong-Ping / Serene Lai vs Karen Pacheco / Betty Lee6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSerene Lai / Karen Toledo vs Yvonne Selner / Diane Currie6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Katrina Jessoe
published
3.84
Ginny Conner
published 4
3.83
Linda Geballe
published
3.81
3.80
Serene Lai
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Natalie Batlin
published
3.68
Lisa Faber
published
3.67
Laura Spivy
published
3.66
Susan Tunnell
published
3.66
Marjorie Swain
published
3.66
Evelyn Armstrong
published 4
3.63
Lara Witter
published
3.62
Claudia Vlasak
published 4
3.61
3.56
Lucia Wallace
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Batlin + Linda Geballe6256% games+2.9% vs expected
Claudia Vlasak + Linda Geballe3246% gamesnot enough data
Natalie Batlin + Serene Lai3248% gamesnot enough data
Marjorie Swain + Lisa Faber314 matchesnot enough data
Linda Geballe + Serene Lai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katrina Jessoe
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.95
4
Ginny Conner
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.84
Linda Geballe
50W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Christy Wasserman
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.81
Serene Lai
22W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Natalie Batlin
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Lisa Faber
21W–19L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Laura Spivy
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Susan Tunnell
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
Marjorie Swain
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Evelyn Armstrong
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Lara Witter
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Claudia Vlasak
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Gwendolyn Holcombe
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Lucia Wallace
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.