Teams

Wilson

2022 Pinellas Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-09vs Tri-ArmstrongWon 20
W#2 DoublesYudi Carpenter / Coquina Homer vs Melissa Voelker / Kelly Armagost6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSuzy Feinberg / Sandra Poston vs Sue Ferrey / Kellie Cyr7-6, 7-6
2022-10-09vs Unregistered CrewSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Wilson / Tami Dalto vs Sonia Patrick / Julie Martin6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Kristie Bryan / Kelley Cargle3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-08vs This Is UsWon 20
W#2 DoublesYudi Carpenter / Coquina Homer vs Precious Cabiling / Sigrid Bratic2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSandra Poston / Suzy Feinberg vs Teresa Orr / Morgan Domson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-08vs The Ball BustersLost 12
L#1 DoublesTami Dalto / Sally Alford vs Deborah Nicklaus / Jennifer Davis3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCoquina Homer / Yudi Carpenter vs Trisha Shirkey / Tori Disalvio7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSuzy Feinberg / Sandra Poston vs Chieko Perry / Jeannine Hodges3-6, 4-6
2022-10-08vs Pinellas/Twisted SistersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Wilson / Tami Dalto vs Stephanie Means / McKenzie O'Brien3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Joy Evans / Anne-Lucie Bouchard1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Sally Alford
published
4.17
Tami Dalto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Yudi Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Kara Beene
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Nancy Finman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Emily Franklin
published 4
3.79
Coquina Homer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Sandra Poston
published
3.37
Suzy Feinberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yudi Carpenter + Coquina Homer15459% games+3.2% vs expected
Kara Beene + Nancy Finman705552% games−2.4% vs expected
Suzy Feinberg + Yudi Carpenter4255% gamesnot enough data
Tami Dalto + Yudi Carpenter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Alford
14W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Tami Dalto
54W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Yudi Carpenter
218W–131L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Kara Beene
240W–153L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Nancy Finman
138W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Emily Franklin
14W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Coquina Homer
121W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
Sandra Poston
48W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Suzy Feinberg
101W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.