Teams

This Is Us

2022 Pinellas Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.10 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-09vs Pinellas/Twisted SistersLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Rena Khawam vs Marcy Faircloth / Abby Kronk4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSibila Harja / Precious Cabiling vs Joy Evans / Anne-Lucie Bouchard1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMorgan Domson / Yvette Gregory vs Wenhong Li / Ronghui You2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-10-09vs The Ball BustersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Rena Khawam vs Deborah Nicklaus / Elaine Aschenbrenner6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMorgan Domson / Teresa Orr vs Jeannine Hodges / Chieko Perry4-6, 2-6
2022-10-08vs Tri-ArmstrongLost 01
L#2 DoublesSigrid Bratic / Sibila Harja vs Berenice Mendez / Prin Vasseur2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-10-08vs WilsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Rena Khawam vs Mary Wilson / Sally Alford6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPrecious Cabiling / Sigrid Bratic vs Yudi Carpenter / Coquina Homer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTeresa Orr / Morgan Domson vs Sandra Poston / Suzy Feinberg7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Rena Khawam vs Rebecca Black / Julie Martin6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Michele Ironsmith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Sigrid Bratic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Alicia Castaneda
published 4
3.75
Monica Sanchez
published
Sibila Harja
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Morgan Domson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Precious Cabiling
published
Jillene Davis
published
Rena Khawam
published
Teresa Orr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sigrid Bratic + Morgan Domson331157% games+3.7% vs expected
Alicia Castaneda + Monica Sanchez7353% games−0.4% vs expected
Sibila Harja + Sigrid Bratic123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.51
4
Sigrid Bratic
124W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Alicia Castaneda
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Monica Sanchez
24W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Sibila Harja
68W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Morgan Domson
68W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Precious Cabiling
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Jillene Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rena Khawam
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Orr
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.