← Search

Jillene Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 95W–54L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history149 matches
L
2026-02-14 · Ardea Braudis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kari Matheny
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-17 · Ardea Braudis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Hungiville
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-11-12 · HCC-Halstead/Sheridan · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michele Vogeley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2023-10-29 · HCC-Halstead/Sheridan · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jenny Hughes
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2023-10-08 · HCC-Halstead/Sheridan · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melissa Sheridan
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-14 · ELW Christison · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Bettencourt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-05-07 · Florida/Houston/55&Over8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Nasworthy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-02 · ELW Christison · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Bettencourt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-03-05 · HCC - C. MacCullough · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Maisner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2023-02-16 · ELW Christison · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Bettencourt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-02-11 · HCC Hansen · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kayla Dyer
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-02-05 · HCC - C. MacCullough · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Zach Stubna mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
59.5%
25W–17L · 52.3% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
80%
24W–6L · 59% of games
8.0mixed
65.5%
38W–20L · 57.5% of games
9.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
37 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer