Teams

Pinellas/Twisted Sisters

2022 Pinellas Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-09vs This Is UsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarcy Faircloth / Abby Kronk vs Michele Ironsmith / Rena Khawam6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-09vs Tri-ArmstrongWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Means / McKenzie O'Brien vs Amy Shoukry / Meagan Brandriff6-4, 6-3
2022-10-08vs Unregistered CrewWon 20
W#1 DoublesAbby Kronk / Marcy Faircloth vs Rebecca Black / Shannon Griffin6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Christina Dausch vs Thuy Duong / Jennifer Bell6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-08vs The Ball BustersWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Means / McKenzie O'Brien vs Elaine Aschenbrenner / Jennifer Davis6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChristina Dausch / Elizabeth Burdick vs Tori Disalvio / Joanne O Ryan7-6, 6-0
2022-10-08vs WilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Means / McKenzie O'Brien vs Mary Wilson / Tami Dalto6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Angie Jones
published 4.5
4.36
Stephanie Means
published
4.19
McKenzie O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Abby Kronk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Matura Suksai
published
3.83
Christina Dausch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
3.77
Ronghui You
published 4
3.76
Elizabeth Burdick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Wenhong Li
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wenhong Li + Ronghui You181059% games+5.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Burdick + Christina Dausch15952% games−2.0% vs expected
Anne-Lucie Bouchard + Matura Suksai404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Jones
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
4.37
Stephanie Means
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
McKenzie O'Brien
74W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Abby Kronk
69W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Matura Suksai
40W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Christina Dausch
180W–109L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
30W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Ronghui You
81W–49L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Elizabeth Burdick
222W–79L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
3.5
Wenhong Li
116W–62L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.