Teams

RMTC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 5.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 5.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-02vs CSUWon 21
L#1 DoublesNeil Kearney / Allen Fu vs Dennis Crow / Ian Kelly3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSean Hollister vs Teagen Crow6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKendall Chitambar / William Gury vs Christopher Fox / Alex Iselin7-6, 7-6
2022-05-26vs MEA YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrian Oldfield / Sean Hollister vs Tee Parham / Broderick Pinto6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAllen Fu / Peter Reiss vs John Fasullo / Patrick Perrin3-6, 2-6
2022-05-21vs FCCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesGreg Schultz / Neil Kearney vs Nolan Polley / Robert Kuseski1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSean Hollister vs Martin Krbec6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllen Fu / William Gury vs Steve Schultz / Marc Weiner3-6, 1-6
2022-05-12vs FRHS GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesKendall Chitambar / Neil Kearney vs Gabriel Pagat / Tanner Trace6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSean Hollister vs Jacob Escobedo6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllen Fu / Peter Reiss vs John Shelby / Joshua Fields2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-05vs HAE BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesNeil Kearney / Sean Hollister vs Luke Hay-Arthur / James Hay-Arthur2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBrian Oldfield vs Cameron Mount6-3, 6-4
2022-04-21vs MEA YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesSean Hollister / Peter Reiss vs John Fasullo / Patrick Perrin6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBrian Oldfield vs John Bernthal7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAllen Fu / William Gury vs Tee Parham / Kevin SIlverman2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 5.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Oldfield
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
Allen Fu
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Greg Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kendall Chitambar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Neil Kearney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Reiss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sean Hollister
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
William Gury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Hollister + Brian Oldfield404 matchesnot enough data
Kendall Chitambar + Peter Reiss123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brian Oldfield
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Allen Fu
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Greg Schultz
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kendall Chitambar
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Neil Kearney
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Reiss
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Hollister
21W–8L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Gury
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.