Teams

CSU

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 5.0 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-02vs RMTC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesDennis Crow / Ian Kelly vs Neil Kearney / Allen Fu6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTeagen Crow vs Sean Hollister1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Fox / Alex Iselin vs Kendall Chitambar / William Gury6-7, 6-7
2022-05-25vs MEA YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesDennis Crow / Teagen Crow vs Calvin Bennett / John Fasullo3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Bronson / Branko Banic vs Kevin SIlverman / Patrick Perrin3-6, 2-6
2022-05-12vs FCCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesIan Kelly / Frank Bronson vs Nolan Polley / Robert Kuseski4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBranko Banic / Christopher Fox vs Lucas Martin / Scott Warner4-6, 1-6
2022-05-05vs FRHS GOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlex Iselin / Frank Bronson vs Gabriel Pagat / Tanner Trace1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Fox vs Zach Hartman4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBranko Banic / Ian Kelly vs Jesse Chavez / Jacob Escobedo1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-21vs HAE BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesFrank Bronson / Christopher Fox vs Luke Hay-Arthur / Cameron Mount3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Hagan / Alex Iselin vs W Leach / Luke Snyder2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 5.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Dennis Crow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Frank Bronson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.28
Christopher Fox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Branko Banic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Alex Iselin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Teagen Crow
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Crow + Christopher Fox7160% games+0.0% vs expected
Branko Banic + Christopher Fox314 matchesnot enough data
Frank Bronson + Dennis Crow404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dennis Crow
38W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Frank Bronson
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Christopher Fox
54W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Branko Banic
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Alex Iselin
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Teagen Crow
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.