Teams

HAE BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 5.0 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 5.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-06vs FRHS GOLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Hay-Arthur / W Leach vs Jacob Escobedo / Jesse Chavez3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNeil Wilcox vs Joshua Fields6-1, 6-0
2022-05-12vs MEA YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesLuke Hay-Arthur / James Hay-Arthur vs John Fasullo / Patrick Perrin5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNeil Wilcox / Cameron Mount vs John Bernthal / Tee Parham2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-05vs RMTC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLuke Hay-Arthur / James Hay-Arthur vs Neil Kearney / Sean Hollister6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCameron Mount vs Brian Oldfield3-6, 4-6
2022-04-28vs FCCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLuke Hay-Arthur / James Hay-Arthur vs Steve Schultz / Marc Weiner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNeil Wilcox vs Nolan Polley7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesW Leach / Cameron Mount vs Martin Krbec / Scott Warner7-5, 6-3
2022-04-21vs CSUWon 30
W#1 DoublesLuke Hay-Arthur / Cameron Mount vs Frank Bronson / Christopher Fox6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesNeil Wilcox vs Ian Kelly6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesW Leach / Luke Snyder vs Patrick Hagan / Alex Iselin6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MEN 5.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MEA YELLOW7017414162
2HAE BLUE329612103
3GTC BLACK34101122192
4DTP RED3491226201
5FRHS GOLD2571431207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.43 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cameron Mount
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
4.43
Neil Wilcox
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
James Hay-Arthur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Luke Hay-Arthur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Luke Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
W Leach
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Hay-Arthur + James Hay-Arthur4359% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cameron Mount
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Neil Wilcox
14W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
4.43
James Hay-Arthur
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Luke Hay-Arthur
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Luke Snyder
16W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
W Leach
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.