Teams

Wicked Days

2025 FALL DAYTIME DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.08 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-06vs Scared HitlessLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Mckinney / Jodi Whittaker vs Vicki Osweiler / Erica Gibbons1-6, 3-6
2025-09-22vs Nothing But LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesLora Bonser / Jill Mckinney vs Lynn Clanton / Treva Pline6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-15vs Slice & DiceLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Mckinney / Michelle Brack vs Bonnie Stotland / Wendy Figliuolo1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
140-Love & Fabulous701838120
2Crane Creek DD's 7.06116515144
3Nothing But Love3481328194
4Sunshine Sisters3491228212
5Wicked Days3481330209
6Smash Squad0771432226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Farrell Kessler
published 3
3.13
Lora Bonser
published 3.5
3.12
3.11
Amy Costello
published 3.5
3.11
Morgan White
published 3
3.08
Amy Pugsley
published 3
3.00
2.94
Jodi Whittaker
published 3
2.89
Valencia Bilyeu
published 3
2.80
Teresa Lyon
published 3
2.78
Michelle Brack
published 3
2.74
Christa Napier
published 3
Jill Mckinney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Pugsley + Morgan White11266% games+5.5% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Lora Bonser8361% games+4.2% vs expected
Jodi Whittaker + Michelle McSorley8653% games+3.1% vs expected
Lora Bonser + Amy Costello5157% games+1.7% vs expected
Lora Bonser + Valencia Bilyeu71049% games−5.7% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Jill Mckinney18860% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Lyon + Valencia Bilyeu5651% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Lyon + Michelle Brack5364% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Farrell Kessler
106W–81L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Lora Bonser
117W–110L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Kristina Winterling
113W–77L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
3.5
Amy Costello
148W–95L career · type A · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Morgan White
73W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
3
Amy Pugsley
82W–46L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Michelle McSorley
72W–49L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Jodi Whittaker
59W–54L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Valencia Bilyeu
145W–124L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Teresa Lyon
167W–112L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Michelle Brack
33W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Christa Napier
81W–65L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Jill Mckinney
67W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.