Teams

Smash Sisters

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

20 players · average NTRP 3.17 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-07-09vs Simply SmashingWon 10
W#2 SinglesAmanda Hanby vs Maria Garatea6-3, 6-2
2021-06-28vs Grand Slam GalsWon 10
W#2 DoublesHailey Smith / Amanda Hanby vs Caleigh Hines / Susan Keller6-1, 6-2
2021-06-16vs Simply SmashingWon 21
W#2 DoublesAmanda Hanby / Hailey Smith vs Tammy Chavez / Maria Garatea6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLori Muench vs Heidi Friend6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCheri Nelson / Suzy Landis vs Katie Patrick / Portia Rauer2-6, 3-6
2021-06-02vs Grand Slam GalsWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristina Elder / Suzy Landis vs Andrea Straub / Sandra Healy6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLori Muench vs Ashley Locke6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Dawn Crochet
published 3.5
3.42
Hailey Smith
published 3.5
3.37
Christina Elder
published 3.5
3.26
Fariss Mcgee
published 3.5
3.21
Maggie Horvat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Nelda Denton
published
2.83
Jamie Hammond
published 3
2.77
Cheri Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Cindy Tuck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Sheri Wippel
published 3
2.73
Nikki Whiting
published 3
2.72
Brenda Bourn
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.33
Carole Dobrowolski
published 2.5
Amanda Hanby
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jennifer Rusk
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Katrina Basye
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Haskell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lori Muench
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Michele Rice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Suzy Landis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fariss Mcgee + Dawn Crochet251655% games+2.2% vs expected
Fariss Mcgee + Hailey Smith91056% games+1.6% vs expected
Carole Dobrowolski + Cheri Nelson282848% games+1.2% vs expected
Nelda Denton + Fariss Mcgee5746% games−3.1% vs expected
Carole Dobrowolski + Christina Elder3345% games−7.9% vs expected
Katrina Basye + Sheri Wippel423850% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Rusk + Nikki Whiting131751% gamesnot enough data
Michele Rice + Christina Elder161257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Crochet
170W–181L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Hailey Smith
97W–110L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Christina Elder
63W–71L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Fariss Mcgee
79W–93L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Maggie Horvat
32W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Nelda Denton
88W–106L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Jamie Hammond
31W–57L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Cheri Nelson
43W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cindy Tuck
22W–26L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3
Sheri Wippel
112W–119L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Nikki Whiting
26W–41L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Brenda Bourn
62W–48L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
2.5
Carole Dobrowolski
33W–53L career · no lines in 2021
0%90%10%
2.33
Amanda Hanby
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Rusk
58W–84L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Katrina Basye
59W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Haskell
78W–129L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lori Muench
16W–20L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele Rice
19W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Suzy Landis
42W–34L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.