Teams

Simply Smashing

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-12vs Match MarvelsLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Cannon / Portia Rauer vs Dyan Goulet / Stephanie Churchman3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Patrick / Maria Garatea vs Jill Mckinney / Natalie Carlise4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-10Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Mills / Portia Rauer vs Shawna Byington / Stacie Hildebrandt4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Cannon / Maria Garatea vs Jennifer Small / Marie Parker0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Chavez / Kelly Tonkin vs Kimberly Stewart / Kristen Koenig4-6, 4-6
2021-07-09vs Smash SistersLost 02
L#2 DoublesKelly Tonkin / Katie Patrick vs Fariss Mcgee / Hailey Smith3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesMaria Garatea vs Amanda Hanby3-6, 2-6
2021-06-27Won 40
W#1 DoublesAnne Comstock / Portia Rauer vs Mary-Katherine Ekins / Ashley Locke6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Cannon / Patricia Hoffman vs Sandra Holmes / Kendra Hines6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKaren Sheehan vs Andrea Straub6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Garatea / Kelly Tonkin vs Michele Bowden / Jennifer Boyd7-6, 6-3
2021-06-16vs Smash SistersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTammy Chavez / Maria Garatea vs Amanda Hanby / Hailey Smith1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Patrick / Portia Rauer vs Cheri Nelson / Suzy Landis6-2, 6-3
2021-06-14Lost 03
L#2 DoublesKatie Patrick / Maria Garatea vs Jinny Giery / Katie McHargue2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKara Anderson vs Sonia Ivanova4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Cannon / Kelly Tonkin vs Marie Parker / Stacie Hildebrandt1-6, 1-6
2021-06-07vs Grand Slam GalsWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Tonkin / Portia Rauer vs Lisa Altorfer / Kendra Hines4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaren Sheehan vs Susan Keller2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Cannon / Maria Garatea vs Angela Hill / Judy DeBoer6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTammy Chavez vs Caleigh Hines6-0, 7-5
2021-06-02vs Match MarvelsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJessica Oliver / Tammy Chavez vs Tisha Purdy / Dyan Goulet2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Hoffman / Anne Comstock vs Teresa Lyon / Angie Magnuson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Patrick / Karen Sheehan vs Laurie Nowierski / Natalie Carlise6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
KATIE RATLIFF
published 3
2.81
Carol Mills
published 3
Anne Comstock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Heidi Friend
published 3
2.70
Christine Cannon
published 3
Jessica Oliver
published
Kara Anderson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Karen Sheehan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Katie Patrick
published
Kelly Tonkin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Maria Garatea
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Patricia Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Portia Rauer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Tammy Chavez
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Friend + Karen Sheehan323646% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cannon + Patricia Hoffman121648% gamesnot enough data
Anne Comstock + Portia Rauer121351% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cannon + Maria Garatea14453% gamesnot enough data
Carol Mills + Maria Garatea8848% gamesnot enough data
Carol Mills + Patricia Hoffman10254% gamesnot enough data
Karen Sheehan + Christine Cannon6254% gamesnot enough data
KATIE RATLIFF + Maria Garatea6258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
KATIE RATLIFF
127W–121L career · no lines in 2021
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Carol Mills
71W–81L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Anne Comstock
31W–33L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Heidi Friend
101W–130L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Christine Cannon
82W–136L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
Jessica Oliver
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kara Anderson
30W–25L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Karen Sheehan
77W–84L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Katie Patrick
17W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Tonkin
19W–52L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Maria Garatea
63W–82L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Hoffman
114W–123L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Portia Rauer
47W–49L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tammy Chavez
41W–56L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.