Teams

Match Marvels

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 3.35 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-12vs Simply SmashingWon 10
W#3 DoublesJill Mckinney / Natalie Carlise vs Katie Patrick / Maria Garatea6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-07-09vs Double ShotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Hosac / Jill Mckinney vs Robin Toney / Gracie Franks3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTisha Purdy vs Sydney Lewis6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLaurie Nowierski / Natalie Carlise vs Nichole Caropino / Heidi Linzbach3-6, 4-6
2021-06-23vs Grand Slam GalsWon 20
W#1 SinglesTisha Purdy vs Andrea Straub6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Jones / Jacqueline Lawley vs Ashley Locke / Kristen Veseth7-6, 6-2
2021-06-16vs Double ShotsWon 40
W#1 DoublesTisha Purdy / Christa Napier vs Erin Retelle / Suzanne Hickok7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie Carlise / Michelle McSorley vs Heidi Linzbach / Nichole Caropino6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJill Mckinney vs McKenzie Ford6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Jones / Jacqueline Lawley vs Terri Cole / Stacey Roth6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-02vs Simply SmashingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTisha Purdy / Dyan Goulet vs Jessica Oliver / Tammy Chavez6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaurie Nowierski / Natalie Carlise vs Katie Patrick / Karen Sheehan0-6, 5-7
2021-05-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesCatherine Jones / Jacqueline Lawley vs Deena Emry / Ashley Locke6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Angie Magnuson
published 4
3.39
Molly Otter
published 3.5
3.36
Jacqueline Lawley
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Lindsey Cassidy
published 3.5
3.26
Stephanie Churchman
published 3.5
3.13
Lora Bonser
published 3.5
3.10
Dyan Goulet
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Lori Hosac
published 3.5
3.00
2.97
Catherine Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Laurie Nowierski
published 3
2.80
Teresa Lyon
published 3
2.74
Christa Napier
published 3
Jill Mckinney
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Barton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Natalie Carlise
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tisha Purdy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Hosac + Stephanie Churchman11359% games+9.4% vs expected
Dyan Goulet + Stephanie Churchman12661% games+4.4% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Lora Bonser8361% games+4.2% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Stephanie Churchman9654% games−6.0% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Lori Hosac17659% games−6.2% vs expected
Laurie Nowierski + Michelle McSorley4550% games−7.5% vs expected
Dyan Goulet + Lori Hosac81245% games−24.8% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Jill Mckinney18860% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Magnuson
113W–90L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Molly Otter
136W–82L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Jacqueline Lawley
69W–49L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Lindsey Cassidy
111W–79L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Stephanie Churchman
136W–92L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lora Bonser
117W–110L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dyan Goulet
60W–69L career · 5 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Lori Hosac
101W–89L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Michelle McSorley
72W–49L career · no lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Catherine Jones
25W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Laurie Nowierski
65W–40L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Teresa Lyon
167W–112L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Christa Napier
81W–65L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
Jill Mckinney
67W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Barton
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Natalie Carlise
10W–23L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tisha Purdy
47W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.