Teams

LCTA18/Donahue/DunesWest

2022 USTA 18 & Over Spring · 18 & over Women 3.5 - Night

21 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & over Women 3.5 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Holly Mummert
published 3.5
3.24
Karen Meszaros
published
3.23
Marissa Regan
published
3.17
Erika Colbrunn
published 3.5
3.09
Leslie Baraso
published
3.07
Lisette Glennon
published
3.06
Jennifer Tallmadge
published
3.03
Kim Frankel
published
3.01
Connie Biggs
published 3.5
2.99
Anya Kent
published 3
2.94
Traci Smith
published
2.92
Staci Houser
published
2.82
Maria McTighe
published
2.79
Paige Kuehmeier
published
2.78
Kimberly Shellnutt
published
2.76
Anne Underkofler
published 3
2.76
Jenifer Lake
published
2.73
Robin White
published
Katie Donahue
published
Lynda Hamilton
published
Monica Pfohl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Baraso + Holly Mummert6259% games+18.2% vs expected
Anne Underkofler + Anya Kent6064% games+8.4% vs expected
Leslie Baraso + Monica Pfohl5542% games+7.8% vs expected
Kimberly Shellnutt + Connie Biggs5350% games+6.3% vs expected
Leslie Baraso + Marissa Regan3546% games+4.1% vs expected
Holly Mummert + Connie Biggs7352% games+1.0% vs expected
Holly Mummert + Jennifer Tallmadge31149% games+0.3% vs expected
Holly Mummert + Karen Meszaros4163% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Holly Mummert
75W–86L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
Karen Meszaros
51W–63L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Marissa Regan
33W–40L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Erika Colbrunn
54W–52L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Leslie Baraso
50W–113L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lisette Glennon
11W–18L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jennifer Tallmadge
32W–73L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Kim Frankel
29W–59L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Connie Biggs
31W–45L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Anya Kent
66W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
Traci Smith
12W–27L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
Staci Houser
19W–52L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.92
Maria McTighe
13W–36L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Paige Kuehmeier
17W–35L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
Kimberly Shellnutt
51W–53L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Anne Underkofler
22W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Jenifer Lake
32W–58L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Robin White
56W–60L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Katie Donahue
60W–40L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynda Hamilton
24W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Monica Pfohl
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.