Teams

RED ROCK CC

2021 NTA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE · 7.0 MEN

4 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-16vs DTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRobert Campbell / Edward Dibble vs George Pietro / Stephen Cereghino6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / Thomas Waite vs Mark Smith / Don Curnutt5-7, 1-6
2021-02-26vs SPANISH OAKSWon 20
W#2 DoublesThomas Waite / Craig Slayter vs Reynaldo Ayala / Dino Mendicino7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Campbell / Edward Dibble vs Dayton Baldwin / Victor Seville6-2, 6-0
2021-02-19vs DTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCraig Slayter / Thomas Waite vs Stephen Spelman / John Terry3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRobert Campbell / JC Cifuentes vs Absalom Alcaraz / James Wichert7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-02-05vs SPANISH OAKSSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRobert Campbell / Jorge Camiletti vs Victor Seville / Abraham Delfin6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJack Braman / Thomas Waite vs Dino Mendicino / Meynardo Sanchez4-6, 2-6
2021-01-29vs DTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Campbell / Edward Dibble vs George Pietro / Gary Miller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCraig Slayter / Thomas Waite vs Jim Roulias / Michael Gifford4-6, 5-7
2021-01-15vs SPANISH OAKSWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Slayter / Thomas Waite vs Eduardo Aradanas / Victor Seville6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobert Campbell / JC Cifuentes vs Dino Mendicino / Reynaldo Ayala7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Jack Braman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.87
Craig Slayter
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.63
Thomas Waite
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Waite + Craig Slayter41937% games−8.4% vs expected
Jack Braman + Craig Slayter4740% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Waite + Jack Braman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jack Braman
96W–97L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
2.98
3.5
Craig Slayter
103W–194L career · 5 lines in 2021
85%15%<1%
2.87
Thomas Waite
41W–133L career · 6 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
2.63
Robert Campbell
70W–52L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.