Teams

LCTA18/GRIMM/LTPDI

USTA 18 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Annmarie Taggio
published 4
3.67
Nima Moghadam
published
3.67
Jordan Brodsky
published
3.64
Kirsten Lanphear
published
3.63
Evelyn Young
published
3.56
Kimberly Ryan
published
3.55
Keith Pridgen
published
3.55
MacIej Dziurgot
published
3.35
Deana Cumbie
published 3.5
3.32
Katie Buss
published
3.26
Erin Grimm
published
3.16
Steve Fennell
published
3.13
Dana Cumbie
published 3.5
2.81
David Lanphear
published 3
2.70
Leah Surles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Ryan + Keith Pridgen0529% games−13.5% vs expected
Erin Grimm + Jordan Brodsky314 matchesnot enough data
Deana Cumbie + Dana Cumbie033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annmarie Taggio
74W–70L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Nima Moghadam
50W–55L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Jordan Brodsky
81W–45L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Kirsten Lanphear
54W–41L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Evelyn Young
55W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.63
Kimberly Ryan
46W–63L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Keith Pridgen
102W–100L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
MacIej Dziurgot
118W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Deana Cumbie
55W–75L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Katie Buss
65W–42L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Erin Grimm
51W–54L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Steve Fennell
96W–53L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Dana Cumbie
46W–52L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
David Lanphear
84W–62L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Leah Surles
32W–29L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.