Teams

JBTC - Stone

2025 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-24vs Duval/Latta-Raines/55&Over7.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Kelley / Vandi Cole vs Kelly Cusick / Linda Valinho6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesVandi Cole / Karen Miller vs Micki Marvin / Jenny Ross6-3, 6-0
2025-02-22vs San Jose - HennessyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Miller / Vandi Cole vs Kristin Fernandez / Caroline Costa6-4, 6-3
2025-02-15vs Kraft - DoucetteWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Kelley / Vandi Cole vs Barbara Dovin / Brooke Rowland6-2, 6-0
2025-02-08vs Southside - ShumanLost 01
L#2 DoublesVandi Cole / Elizabeth Messina vs Lezita Davis / Shari Shuman2-6, 3-6
2025-02-01vs FYC - MorrealeWon 10
W#3 DoublesCherie Johnson / Vandi Cole vs Dawn Crawford / Elsa Scagel6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Paula Burdash
published
3.40
Aura Bernal
published 3.5
3.38
Vandi Cole
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.38
Carol Kelley
published 3.5
3.38
Diane Stone
published 3.5
3.19
Tammy Oswald
published
3.18
Lois Robichaud
published
3.12
Elizabeth Messina
published
3.07
Cherie Johnson
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Oswald + Vandi Cole7548% games−1.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Messina + Diane Stone1436% gamesnot enough data
Aura Bernal + Diane Stone4158% gamesnot enough data
Paula Burdash + Aura Bernal314 matchesnot enough data
Paula Burdash + Diane Stone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Burdash
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Aura Bernal
23W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Vandi Cole
78W–46L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Carol Kelley
24W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Diane Stone
24W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Tammy Oswald
18W–19L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Lois Robichaud
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Elizabeth Messina
9W–24L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cherie Johnson
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.