Teams

Team 6 Full Metal Racquets

2021 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.93 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-02-17vs Team 1 High RollersLost 01
L#1 DoublesGlen Medina / Adriana Rice vs Gonzague de BONFILS / Marie Taylor1-6, 4-6
2021-02-09vs Team 3 Can't Ace ThisWon 10
W#1 DoublesSonia Valdes / Carlos Scartascini vs Jorge Sirgo / Joanne Good6-1, 6-0
2021-01-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFranklin Doan / Alison Bouwmeester vs Sarah Baker / Alain Bailey2-6, 4-6
2021-01-12vs Team 13 Double TroubleWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Bouwmeester / Sonia Valdes vs Russ Roberts / Patricia Shepard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGlen Medina / Cecilia Jackson vs Barry Dickman / Heather Huling7-6, 2-2
2021-01-09vs Team 9 MidCourt CrisisLost 01
L#2 DoublesFranklin Doan / Alison Bouwmeester vs David Viar / Rebecca Davenport1-6, 1-6
2021-01-05vs Team 12 Nuts & HoneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesSonia Valdes / Brian Cheng vs Kaushiki Valluri / Blake Nuwayhid6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2020-12-28vs Team 7 Over ServedLost 01
L#1 DoublesGlen Medina / Adriana Rice vs Erika Trost / Jorge Prieto Choy2-6, 0-6
2020-12-17vs Team 4 Stars & StripesWon 10
W#1 DoublesCecilia Jackson / Glen Medina vs Kristin Clegg / Robert Clark2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Elango Rengasamy
published 4
3.93
Kayley Duval
published
3.80
Brian Cheng
published 4
3.77
Sonia Valdes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Adriana Rice
published 4
3.46
Glen Medina
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.29
Susan Velasco
published
3.26
Carrie Gray
published 4
3.00
Alison Bouwmeester
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Shapiro
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elango Rengasamy
96W–46L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.93
Kayley Duval
6W–20L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.93
4
Brian Cheng
25W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Sonia Valdes
348W–174L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Adriana Rice
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Glen Medina
84W–132L career · 4 lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
3.46
Susan Velasco
51W–22L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
4
Carrie Gray
19W–7L career · no lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
3.26
3.5
Alison Bouwmeester
68W–115L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
Elizabeth Shapiro
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.