Teams

Team 4 Stars & Stripes

2021 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-02-04vs Team 5 Dominant Mixed StrategyLost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Clark / Kristin Clegg vs Trent Billups / Eva Webster2-6, 5-5
L#3 DoublesDavid Torborg / Tamara Ashford vs Kenneth Lamar / Giselle Medina3-6, 5-5
2021-01-28vs Team 2 SpoilersLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Torborg / Tamara Ashford vs Laith Peter / Christine Becer3-6, 3-6
2021-01-21vs Team 13 Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Hampton / Tamara Ashford vs Dariusz Kot / Patricia Shepard6-3, 6-7
2021-01-15vs Team 1 High RollersLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Clark / Kristin Clegg vs Gonzague de BONFILS / Marie Taylor3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCedric Lee / Tamara Ashford vs John Pennington / Amanda Wenzel0-6, 2-6
2021-01-14vs Team 11 Aces & EightsLost 01
L#3 DoublesTamara Ashford / Robert Walters vs Errin Matechak / Aravind Krishna0-6, 4-6
2021-01-07vs Team 8 The ShizNETSWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Torborg / Tamara Ashford vs Anthony Chang / Cindy Zettersten7-5, 5-3
2020-12-28vs Team 9 MidCourt CrisisLost 01
L#3 DoublesRaighne Delaney / Mary Beth Edwards vs Edward Scholl / Heather Viar2-4
2020-12-17vs Team 6 Full Metal RacquetsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristin Clegg / Robert Clark vs Cecilia Jackson / Glen Medina6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Beth Edwards / Raighne Delaney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
David Torborg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Tamara Ashford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.64
Raighne Delaney
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.60
3.01
Kristin Clegg
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kristin Reif
published
Mary Beth Edwards
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Ashford + David Torborg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Torborg
16W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Tamara Ashford
35W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Raighne Delaney
71W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Elizabeth Lucchesi
3W–15L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Kristin Clegg
66W–75L career · 9 lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.01
Kristin Reif
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Beth Edwards
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.