Teams

Team 9 MidCourt Crisis

2021 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.07 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-02-07vs Team 11 Aces & EightsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Doe / Teresa Plott vs Aaron Ohmer / Meg Kelly6-0, 6-0
2021-01-23vs Team 8 The ShizNETSWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Krisanda / David Viar vs Kara Stevenson / Krishna Polisetty4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-01-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Krisanda / Soheil Shirzadi vs Bob White / Jenny Herbek6-3, 6-3
2021-01-16vs Team 5 Dominant Mixed StrategyLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Viar / Edward Scholl vs Jira Laprat / Jeff Rosenblum1-6, 6-7
2020-12-28vs Team 4 Stars & StripesWon 10
W#3 DoublesEdward Scholl / Heather Viar vs Raighne Delaney / Mary Beth Edwards4-2
2020-12-13vs Team 2 SpoilersWon 10
W#3 DoublesSoheil Shirzadi / Michele Krisanda vs Laith Peter / Christine Becer6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Jenna Hagood
published
4.27
Soheil Shirzadi
published
Hung Nguyen
published 4.5
4.24
Heather Viar
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.17
Michele Krisanda
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.16
Jonathan Santos
published
4.06
Rebecca Davenport
published
3.86
Cameron Craig
published 4
3.85
Camryn Kim
published 4
3.68
David Viar
published 3.5
3.65
Paul Lluy
published
3.64
Edward Scholl
published 4
3.63
Teresa Plott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Rob Rivera
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Hagood
45W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
4.38
Soheil Shirzadi
17W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Hung Nguyen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Heather Viar
239W–145L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
4.24
Michele Krisanda
145W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
Jonathan Santos
74W–27L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
4.16
Rebecca Davenport
14W–7L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Cameron Craig
44W–39L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Camryn Kim
8W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
David Viar
39W–19L career · no lines in 2021
<1%8%92%
3.68
Paul Lluy
21W–13L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Edward Scholl
3W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Teresa Plott
117W–93L career · 1 line in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
Rob Rivera
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.