Teams

Team 8 The ShizNETS

2021 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-13vs Team 11 Aces & EightsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Zettersten / Russell Ridings vs Meg Kelly / Juan Mayorga3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-01-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Zettersten / Russell Ridings vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-01-23vs Team 9 MidCourt CrisisLost 01
L#1 DoublesKara Stevenson / Krishna Polisetty vs Michele Krisanda / David Viar6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2021-01-14vs Team 12 Nuts & HoneyLost 01
L#3 DoublesRussell Ridings / Katrina Tiedeman vs Jenna Gietl / Mike Wang4-6, 3-6
2021-01-09vs Team 7 Over ServedLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatrina Tiedeman / Krishna Polisetty vs Cara Holtmann / Zachary Launey3-6, 4-4
2021-01-07vs Team 4 Stars & StripesLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnthony Chang / Cindy Zettersten vs David Torborg / Tamara Ashford5-7, 3-5
2020-12-18vs Team 2 SpoilersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKara Stevenson / Krishna Polisetty vs Anita Wilson / David Todd6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Zettersten / Anthony Chang vs Christine Becer / Laith Peter2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Krishna Polisetty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Angie Wong
published 4
Cindy Zettersten
published 4
3.75
VIjay Chari
published
3.56
Russell Ridings
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Cheryl Hughes
published 3.5
3.38
Anthony Chang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Yong Kim
published
Kara Stevenson
published
Sumeet Chawla
published
Will Jenkins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Krishna Polisetty
79W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Angie Wong
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Cindy Zettersten
4W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
VIjay Chari
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Russell Ridings
76W–75L career · 3 lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Cheryl Hughes
26W–55L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Anthony Chang
249W–160L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38
Yong Kim
5W–19L career · no lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
3.26
Kara Stevenson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Premkumar Chindepalli
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sumeet Chawla
23W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Will Jenkins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.