Teams

COLLIER / Burke

2023 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-01vs Players Club - L. SnyderWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Miller / Stephanie Mills vs Kelly Sinclair / Michele Pascale6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Wandler / Colleen Burns Keenan vs Francis Sude / Karen Terzano6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDale N Gray / Kathleen Griffin vs Shirley Bobier / Mary Gorte6-2, 7-6
2023-02-15vs Vineyards - SpiwakWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Miller / Stephanie Mills vs Cari Shaw / Janice Forner6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSusan Wandler / Ann Soper vs Angela Aline / Cindy Leiding6-1, 6-2
2023-02-08vs Pelican Landing - D. BellWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Miller / Stephanie Mills vs Mary Jean Curley / Angie Hall6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Soper / Linda Poston vs Valerie Stavro / Ellen Davis6-2, 7-6
2023-02-01vs Naples Grande - BlackWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Miller / Stephanie Mills vs Sherry Newland / Brita Swanson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Burke / Ann Soper vs Laura Baetz / Ilene Flack6-2, 6-1
2023-01-18vs Players Club - L. SnyderWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Miller / Stephanie Mills vs Kelly Sinclair / Lisa Terry7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDale N Gray / Kathleen Griffin vs Karen Terzano / Sue Wolf6-4, 6-4
2023-01-11vs Naples Grand - ManningSplit 11
L#1 DoublesColleen Burns Keenan / Peggy Reynolds vs Candia Barry / Debra Logue3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Mills / Deborah Miller vs Karen McGuire / Debra Bowman6-2, 6-3
2023-01-04vs Naples Bay Resort - AllenWon 20
W#2 DoublesColleen Burns Keenan / Peggy Reynolds vs Kathy Thurston / Lynn Norris6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Burke / Ann Soper vs Minok Allen / Kristine Miller2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Colleen Burns Keenan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Ann Soper
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.34
Barbara Burke
published 4
3.31
Kathleen Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Peggy Reynolds
published
Stephanie Mills
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Griffin + Ann Soper4158% gamesnot enough data
Colleen Burns Keenan + Ann Soper404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colleen Burns Keenan
108W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Ann Soper
68W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Barbara Burke
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.34
3.5
Kathleen Griffin
44W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Peggy Reynolds
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Mills
37W–18L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.