Teams

Naples Grand - Manning

2023 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-01vs Naples Grande - BlackWon 10
W#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Debra Logue vs Sherry Newland / Hildy Glick6-1, 6-1
2023-02-22vs Pelican Landing - D. BellWon 20
W#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Debra Logue vs Deborah Washburn / Angie Hall6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren McGuire / Mary Lou Roush vs Valerie Stavro / Dale Schneider7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-02-15vs Naples Bay Resort - AllenLost 02
L#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Kathy Healy vs Barbara Tilley / Lynn Norris6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeg Perez / Mary Strohmaier vs Ricki Levine / Peggy Kasilowski4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-08Won 21
W#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Debra Logue vs Cari Shaw / Karen Strand6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Healy / Mary Strohmaier vs Barbara Hess / Debra Bowenkamp3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Manning / Karen McGuire vs Angela Aline / Brenda Bensmiller6-0, 6-2
2023-02-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Debra Logue vs Darlene Bell / Cheryl Kielly6-2, 6-2
2023-01-25Won 20
W#1 DoublesDebra Logue / Candia Barry vs Megan Cohen / Sherry Newland6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJackie Sawicki / Karen McGuire vs Mary Ann Benzing / Katie Cohen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-11vs COLLIER / BurkeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Debra Logue vs Colleen Burns Keenan / Peggy Reynolds6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren McGuire / Debra Bowman vs Stephanie Mills / Deborah Miller2-6, 3-6
2023-01-04vs Players Club - L. SnyderWon 10
W#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Meg Perez vs Loyce Snyder / Francis Sude6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Candia Barry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Debra Logue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ann Manning
published 4
3.62
Meg Perez
published
Jackie Sawicki
published
Joann Hogan
published
Karen McGuire
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lori Sherrill
published
Mary Strohmaier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Ford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen McGuire + Candia Barry5166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Candia Barry
145W–58L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Debra Logue
162W–90L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Ann Manning
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meg Perez
65W–77L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jackie Sawicki
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joann Hogan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen McGuire
68W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Sherrill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Strohmaier
21W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Ford
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.