Teams

Naples Grande - Black

2023 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-01vs Naples Grand - ManningWon 10
W#3 DoublesMegan Cohen / Linda Koole vs Debra Bowman / Sarah Ford6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMegan Cohen / Brita Swanson vs Darlene Bell / Angie Hall2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-02-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJackie Gorinson / Michelle Maggal vs Susan Wandler / Linda Poston4-6, 1-6
2023-01-25vs Naples Grand - ManningLost 01
L#1 DoublesMegan Cohen / Sherry Newland vs Debra Logue / Candia Barry4-6, 1-6
2023-01-18vs Naples Bay Resort - AllenLost 02
L#1 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Megan Cohen vs Barbara Tilley / Ellen Schmidt4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesNancy Black / Laura Baetz vs Minok Allen / Gail Hayton2-6, 3-6
2023-01-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Black / Megan Cohen vs Lisa Terry / Michele Pascale6-3, 6-3
2023-01-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Black / Hildy Glick vs Barbara Hess / Deborah Sawin6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Jackie Gorinson
published 4
3.32
Michelle Maggal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Linda Koole
published 3.5
3.21
Laura Baetz
published
3.21
Brita Swanson
published 3.5
3.19
Ginny Asgeirsson
published 3.5
3.13
Ilene Flack
published 3.5
Hildy Glick
published
Kathie Karp
published
Megan Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Nancy Black
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathie Karp + Nancy Black6349% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Black + Hildy Glick6162% gamesnot enough data
Kathie Karp + Ginny Asgeirsson4255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jackie Gorinson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Michelle Maggal
169W–159L career · 1 line in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Linda Koole
123W–93L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Laura Baetz
43W–34L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Brita Swanson
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Ginny Asgeirsson
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Ilene Flack
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
Hildy Glick
11W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathie Karp
66W–71L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Cohen
38W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Black
70W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.