GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Ninkovich/TW

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings4 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/Ferris/40&over/3.0M	7	2	21	15	36	324
2GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Maynez/EPTC#2	4	5	21	15	31	292
3GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Ninkovich/TW	4	5	16	20	44	339
4GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Rhoades/FB	3	6	14	22	47	356

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01

Bill Ruddock

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3

2.90

Christopher Mowad

usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.88

Andrew Michnovicz

usually #2 Doubles 49%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3

2.85

David Thurman

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.84

Daniel Gallatin

usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 3

2.78

Charles Stephens

usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3

2.76

Christopher Ninkovich

usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 10% · published 3

—

Edward Sosa

usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published —

—

James Zanolli

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —

—

John O'Leary

usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published —

—

Juan Arevalo

usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Medardo Montoya

usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Oren Belkin

usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Pierre Lacasse-Jobin

usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published —

—

Ricardo Luther

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published —

—

Sergio E Chavez

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published —

—

William Tepsick

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Thurman + Christopher Ninkovich	12–10	55% games	not enough data
Sergio E Chavez + Pierre Lacasse-Jobin	9–2	61% games	not enough data
Daniel Gallatin + Oren Belkin	4–6	47% games	not enough data
Medardo Montoya + Daniel Gallatin	7–1	64% games	not enough data
Oren Belkin + John O'Leary	6–2	54% games	not enough data
Bill Ruddock + Pierre Lacasse-Jobin	5–2	60% games	not enough data
Juan Arevalo + James Zanolli	2–4	35% games	not enough data
William Tepsick + James Zanolli	0–5	20% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Bill Ruddock

73W–81L career · 35 lines in 2026

<1%46%54%

3.01

Christopher Mowad

24W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%77%23%

2.90

Andrew Michnovicz

108W–70L career · 33 lines in 2026

<1%81%19%

2.88

David Thurman

35W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026

1%85%14%

2.85

Daniel Gallatin

52W–80L career · 17 lines in 2026

1%86%13%

2.84

Charles Stephens

37W–49L career · 13 lines in 2026

2%92%6%

2.78

Christopher Ninkovich

25W–25L career · 10 lines in 2026

3%93%4%

2.76

—

Edward Sosa

50W–69L career · 25 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

James Zanolli

6W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

John O'Leary

36W–31L career · 26 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Juan Arevalo

16W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Medardo Montoya

36W–38L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Oren Belkin

46W–44L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Pierre Lacasse-Jobin

18W–13L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ricardo Luther

13W–8L career · 16 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sergio E Chavez

37W–16L career · 18 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

William Tepsick

22W–82L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.