Teams

GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Rhoades/FB

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Ferris/40&over/3.0M72211536324
2GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Maynez/EPTC#245211531292
3GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Ninkovich/TW45162044339
4GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Rhoades/FB36142247356

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Adrian Urias
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Donald Rhodes
published
Ernesto Landeros
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Hector Montelongo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
James Lambeth
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
James McCleland
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Joe Centeno
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Jorge Coreano
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Kevin Woodson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Manny Casillas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Manouchehr Refaeian
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mike Scott
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Pat Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Roy Torres
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Samuel Tiglao
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Sergio Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Woodson + Jorge Coreano9652% gamesnot enough data
James Lambeth + Adrian Urias7356% gamesnot enough data
Pat Rodriguez + James McCleland5359% gamesnot enough data
James Lambeth + James McCleland2443% gamesnot enough data
James Lambeth + Kevin Woodson3353% gamesnot enough data
James Lambeth + Jorge Coreano4256% gamesnot enough data
Jorge Coreano + Joe Centeno4157% gamesnot enough data
James Lambeth + Sergio Chavez314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adrian Urias
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Donald Rhodes
26W–36L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ernesto Landeros
16W–3L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hector Montelongo
11W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
James Lambeth
106W–98L career · 31 lines in 2026
not enough data
James McCleland
69W–65L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joe Centeno
44W–34L career · 44 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jorge Coreano
55W–72L career · 38 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Woodson
84W–67L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Manny Casillas
12W–22L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Manouchehr Refaeian
112W–93L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Scott
16W–36L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pat Rodriguez
38W–55L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roy Torres
13W–3L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samuel Tiglao
0W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sergio Chavez
23W–21L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.