Teams

GEPTA/Ferris/40&over/3.0M

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 2.90 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-03-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesCarlos Santini / Jorge Kareh vs Jorge Coreano / Samuel Tiglao7-5, 6-2
2026-01-31Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJorge Kareh / Carlos Santini vs Medardo Montoya / Charles Stephens1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Ferris/40&over/3.0M72211536324
2GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Maynez/EPTC#245211531292
3GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Ninkovich/TW45162044339
4GEPTA/40&over/3.0M/Rhoades/FB36142247356

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Alejandro Borunda
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.92
Christian Charles
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.76
David Turbay
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.66
Craig Fortune
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.32
Collins Preston
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 2.5
Carlos Santini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Edgar Borrego
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Guillermo Juarez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Hector Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Jorge Kareh
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Jose Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Juan Taveras
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Julio Terrazas
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Michael Ferris
published
Roger Molina
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 21% · published
Ruben Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Taveras + Collins Preston11019% gamesnot enough data
Ruben Ramirez + Jorge Kareh4545% gamesnot enough data
Craig Fortune + Jorge Kareh2347% gamesnot enough data
Guillermo Juarez + Alejandro Borunda224 matchesnot enough data
Julio Terrazas + Roger Molina404 matchesnot enough data
Craig Fortune + Ruben Ramirez123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Ferris + Jorge Kareh213 matchesnot enough data
Hector Mendoza + Edgar Borrego033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alejandro Borunda
27W–20L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Christian Charles
29W–17L career · 22 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
David Turbay
18W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Craig Fortune
22W–52L career · 14 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
2.5
Collins Preston
17W–69L career · 28 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Carlos Santini
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Edgar Borrego
24W–36L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Guillermo Juarez
24W–17L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hector Mendoza
19W–52L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jorge Kareh
67W–100L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jose Herrera
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Taveras
6W–38L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julio Terrazas
47W–22L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Ferris
7W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Roger Molina
9W–5L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ruben Ramirez
30W–48L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.