Teams

Greenhill/Chapman-Jacobs W4.0S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-02vs High Point/Villalobos W.4.0SSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEmily Chapman / Lisa Toohey vs Laura Locke / Katie Tran6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAngelique Chan Mcdaniel / Amal Sajdak vs Nycole Vu / Denise Lu3-6, 3-6
2025-10-26vs Greenhill/Colaluca W4.0SWon 10
W#2 DoublesFarah Ashmore / Theresa Lane vs Hope Miller / Hilary Roberts6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Carraway / Amal Sajdak vs Thea Junt / Shana Lazarine3-6, 5-7
2025-10-12vs ESD/Morway-Smith W4.0SWon 20
W#1 DoublesHolly Carraway / Amal Sajdak vs Jill McGill / Meagan York6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTanya Clay / Lisa Toohey vs Jerilynn Fletcher / Carmel Wood7-6, 6-4
2025-10-05vs LB Houston/Schneiderman-Chu W4.0SWon 10
W#1 DoublesTanya Clay / Camille Cruz vs Heather Zetzl / Lori Bennett6-4, 7-6
2025-09-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesFarah Ashmore / Lisa Toohey vs Shannon Farley / Yasmine Meza6-1, 7-5
2025-09-14vs Samuell Grand/Young W4.0SSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAngelique Chan Mcdaniel / Amal Sajdak vs Dana Koerner / Janis Barbash3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Piatas / Lisa Toohey vs Aundi Henderson / Tricia Ericson6-4, 6-1
2025-09-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesFarah Ashmore / Theresa Lane vs Kasey Colvin / Jen Mulhern6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Farah Ashmore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Holly Carraway
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.83
Katheryn Ross
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Camille Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Amy Nickerson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.80
Amal Sajdak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Lia Allen
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.76
Tanya Clay
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.75
Angelique Chan Mcdaniel
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.65
Michelle McGuire
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.59
Julie Piatas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Brandi Ciufi
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Amanda Bodnar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Emily Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Toohey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Carraway + Amal Sajdak314 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Clay + Lia Allen224 matchesnot enough data
Holly Carraway + Angelique Chan Mcdaniel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Farah Ashmore
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Holly Carraway
17W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Katheryn Ross
18W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Camille Cruz
16W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Amy Nickerson
9W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Amal Sajdak
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Lia Allen
9W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Tanya Clay
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Angelique Chan Mcdaniel
8W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Michelle McGuire
9W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Julie Piatas
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Brandi Ciufi
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Amanda Bodnar
8W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Emily Chapman
11W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.17
Lisa Toohey
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.