Teams

High Point/Villalobos W.4.0S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-02vs Greenhill/Chapman-Jacobs W4.0SWon 10
W#3 DoublesNycole Vu / Denise Lu vs Angelique Chan Mcdaniel / Amal Sajdak6-3, 6-3
2025-10-19vs ESD/Morway-Smith W4.0SWon 10
W#3 DoublesRita Wilson / Denise Lu vs Michele Beach / Lauren Haley6-2, 6-3
2025-10-05vs TBarM/Scott W4.0SSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRoz Erlewein / Denise Lu vs Jennifer Scott / Wendy Holiner0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMimi Tran / Nycole Vu vs Gabby Spilo / Priyal Patel6-3, 6-4
2025-09-14vs Fretz/Hull W4.0SWon 20
W#2 DoublesRoz Erlewein / Jill Thompson vs Rosalyn Luong / Angela James7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNycole Vu / Denise Lu vs Jennifer Hull / Ann Liu4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Greenhill/Schonwald-Newberg W4.0S81261022233
2High Point/Villalobos W.4.0S72261028273
3Samuell Grand/Young W4.0S54211533252
4Greenhill/Nevelow W4.0S54211534297
5TBarM/Scott W4.0S45181844334
6Samuell Grand/Wise W4.0S45132349353
7Rockwall GAC/Lafferty W4.0S36132351358
8Lifetime Plano/Flores-Rolater W4.0S1863061398
9LB Houston/Schneiderman-Chu W4.0S0963063411

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Kristen Aragon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.88
Roz Erlewein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Maria Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published
3.86
Nycole Vu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Beth Parks
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.84
Kelsey Thornton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.78
Katherine Motlagh
published
3.75
Valerie van Ausdall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jannine Soldan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.73
Katie Tran
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.73
Nidia Bridges
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.69
Denise Lu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Theresa Batoon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Gina Paterno Villalobos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Judy Barbo
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.58
Duang-Nate TRISARNSRI
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Suzanne Kim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Laura Locke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kelli Butcher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Rita Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Caldwell + Kristen Aragon7459% games+8.0% vs expected
Beth Parks + Kristen Aragon9063% games+5.4% vs expected
Beth Parks + Jannine Soldan7063% games+3.0% vs expected
Nycole Vu + Denise Lu4156% gamesnot enough data
Nidia Bridges + Judy Barbo224 matchesnot enough data
Katie Tran + Valerie van Ausdall224 matchesnot enough data
Maria Caldwell + Valerie van Ausdall314 matchesnot enough data
Maria Caldwell + Jannine Soldan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Aragon
34W–15L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.99
Roz Erlewein
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Maria Caldwell
24W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Nycole Vu
33W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Beth Parks
30W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Kelsey Thornton
18W–0L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
Katherine Motlagh
13W–14L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Valerie van Ausdall
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Jannine Soldan
21W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Katie Tran
18W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Nidia Bridges
16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Denise Lu
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
Theresa Batoon
28W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Gina Paterno Villalobos
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Judy Barbo
11W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.62
Duang-Nate TRISARNSRI
23W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
Suzanne Kim
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.42
Laura Locke
7W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.23
Kelli Butcher
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rita Wilson
12W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.