Teams

Samuell Grand/Wise W4.0S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-02vs High Point/Ethington-Housley W4.0SLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Rowden / Courtney Yates vs Cindy Taylor / Jennifer Sekhon2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesVictoria Coffee vs Artemis Boulamatsi6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKatherine Wise / Evyn Fairman vs Jennifer Garrett / Brooke Rich2-6, 3-6
2025-10-26Lost 03
L#1 SinglesVictoria Coffee vs Sarah Davis3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEvyn Fairman / Courtney Yates vs Janine Pesusich / Pamela Kvale2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Rice / Michelle Rowden vs Sheela Thomas / Janet Apostle1-6, 1-6
2025-10-19vs Greenhill/Nevelow W4.0SLost 13
L#1 DoublesPaula Brunson / Courtney Yates vs Patricia Arvanitis / Anne Doise4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesVictoria Coffee vs Gianna Cerullo6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatherine Wise / Evyn Fairman vs Gina Manning / Rebecca Neal4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTanya Teeter / Jessica Rice vs Melany White / Katie Talman2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-12Won 30
W#1 DoublesKayla Chen / Courtney Yates vs Christina Lafferty / Elaine Jones6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVictoria Coffee vs Julie Fecht6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatherine Wise / Evyn Fairman vs SHELLEY ARKELL / Megan Boyle7-5, 6-2
2025-10-05vs Greenhill/Kaplan-Quadlander W4.0SLost 12
W#1 SinglesVictoria Coffee vs Zainab Ilahi6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEvyn Fairman / Kayla Chen vs Christine Quadlander / Aimee Cali3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Brunson / Tanya Teeter vs Molly Carson / Rochelle Watson6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2025-09-28vs Huffhines/Chin W4.0SLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaula Brunson / Tanya Teeter vs Diane Hashimoto / Jamie Debusk-Loop4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCourtney Yates / Evyn Fairman vs Kimberly Pham / Ling Xu6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatherine Wise / Michelle Rowden vs Alexandra Gardner / Ngoc Foster7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-21vs Canyon Creek/Gooch W4.0SWon 20
W#1 SinglesVictoria Coffee vs Sheila Sergiovanni6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Wise / Michelle Rowden vs April Moeser / Laurin Shambora4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-14Lost 02
L#2 DoublesPaula Brunson / Tanya Teeter vs Michelle Marketos / Louise Bexley1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Yates / Katherine Wise vs Courtney Kunz / Marci Addington5-7, 2-6
2025-09-07vs Fretz/Pike-Cady W4.0SWon 21
W#1 SinglesVictoria Coffee vs Laura Rich6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTanya Teeter / Courtney Yates vs Sundee McDonald / Mary Alyce Kaetzel4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Wise / Evyn Fairman vs Melissa Stevenson / Andrea Bradford7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Greenhill/Schonwald-Newberg W4.0S81261022233
2High Point/Villalobos W.4.0S72261028273
3Samuell Grand/Young W4.0S54211533252
4Greenhill/Nevelow W4.0S54211534297
5TBarM/Scott W4.0S45181844334
6Samuell Grand/Wise W4.0S45132349353
7Rockwall GAC/Lafferty W4.0S36132351358
8Lifetime Plano/Flores-Rolater W4.0S1863061398
9LB Houston/Schneiderman-Chu W4.0S0963063411

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Paula Brunson
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
3.80
Artavia Clayton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.72
Courtney Yates
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.55
Kayla Chen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
Tanya Teeter
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Michelle Rowden
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Evyn Fairman
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Katherine Wise
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Victoria Coffee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evyn Fairman + Katherine Wise4549% gamesnot enough data
Tanya Teeter + Paula Brunson033 matchesnot enough data
Kayla Chen + Paula Brunson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Brunson
13W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Artavia Clayton
0W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Courtney Yates
3W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Kayla Chen
19W–11L career · 10 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Tanya Teeter
1W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.31
Michelle Rowden
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Evyn Fairman
9W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katherine Wise
6W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Coffee
6W–1L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.