Teams

Samuell Grand/Young W4.0S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

16 players · average NTRP 3.85 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-02Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDanielle White vs Jerilynn Fletcher2-6, 3-6
2025-10-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDanielle White / Lisa Buitron vs Lori Bennett / Shannon Vivian6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-10-19vs TBarM/Scott W4.0SWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmber Morefield / Lisa Buitron vs Wendy Holiner / Julia McBride6-2, 6-4
2025-09-21Split 11
L#1 SinglesDana Koerner vs Katherine Motlagh2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Buitron / Amber Morefield vs Theresa Batoon / Judy Barbo7-5, 6-3
2025-09-14vs Greenhill/Chapman-Jacobs W4.0SWon 10
W#2 DoublesDana Koerner / Janis Barbash vs Angelique Chan Mcdaniel / Amal Sajdak6-3, 6-4
2025-09-07vs Wagon Wheel/Coffindaffer W4.0SLost 01
L#1 DoublesAundi Henderson / Lisa Buitron vs Bridget Sanderfer / Daniella Bowling3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Greenhill/Schonwald-Newberg W4.0S81261022233
2High Point/Villalobos W.4.0S72261028273
3Samuell Grand/Young W4.0S54211533252
4Greenhill/Nevelow W4.0S54211534297
5TBarM/Scott W4.0S45181844334
6Samuell Grand/Wise W4.0S45132349353
7Rockwall GAC/Lafferty W4.0S36132351358
8Lifetime Plano/Flores-Rolater W4.0S1863061398
9LB Houston/Schneiderman-Chu W4.0S0963063411

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Janis Barbash
published
3.94
Natalie Clarkson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.90
Andrea Ivey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Lisa Buitron
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Amanda VanDenBerg
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4
Dana Koerner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Elizabeth McCrary
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Devon Bowling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Danielle White
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Yvette Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Michelle Hefner
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.55
Elaine Payne
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.38
Heather Evetts
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Amber Morefield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Tricia Ericson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.23
Aundi Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janis Barbash + Natalie Clarkson16078% games+15.8% vs expected
Aundi Henderson + Lisa Buitron7356% games+6.5% vs expected
Yvette Freeman + Amanda VanDenBerg6161% games+1.1% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Elaine Payne4253% games+0.9% vs expected
Amber Morefield + Lisa Buitron5550% games−1.1% vs expected
Yvette Freeman + Devon Bowling4450% games−2.4% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Natalie Clarkson224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Hefner + Danielle White213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janis Barbash
43W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.05
Natalie Clarkson
21W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Andrea Ivey
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.90
Lisa Buitron
19W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Amanda VanDenBerg
52W–31L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Dana Koerner
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Elizabeth McCrary
20W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Devon Bowling
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Danielle White
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.64
Yvette Freeman
39W–42L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
Michelle Hefner
30W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Elaine Payne
15W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Heather Evetts
26W–32L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Amber Morefield
35W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Tricia Ericson
22W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Aundi Henderson
32W–28L career · 9 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.