Teams

Samuell Grand/Melson-Hilliard W3.5 (F2023 WC)

2023 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Meg Lohr
published
3.89
Paula Brunson
published
3.82
Louise Bexley
published
3.78
Tricia Roos
published
3.50
Brenda Talavera
published 4
3.36
Stephanie Hilliard
published
3.35
Kimberly Melson
published
3.33
Tina Kimbell
published
Eileen Kendall
published 3.5
Gabby Rumore
published 3.5
3.22
Erin Shreiner
published 3.5
3.21
Alyson Woodard
published 3.5
3.10
Elizabeth Peaslee
published 3.5
2.52
Cindy Lyle
published 3
Libby Johnson
published
Rebecca Pearson
published
Sheridan Pettit
published
Sonia Browne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Lohr + Louise Bexley7071% games+7.6% vs expected
Tricia Roos + Louise Bexley8657% games−1.7% vs expected
Kimberly Melson + Stephanie Hilliard314 matchesnot enough data
Tina Kimbell + Stephanie Hilliard213 matchesnot enough data
Meg Lohr + Tricia Roos303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Lohr
53W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
4.02
Paula Brunson
23W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
Louise Bexley
37W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
Tricia Roos
31W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Brenda Talavera
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Stephanie Hilliard
18W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Kimberly Melson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
Tina Kimbell
19W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Eileen Kendall
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Gabby Rumore
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Erin Shreiner
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Alyson Woodard
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Elizabeth Peaslee
8W–38L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Cindy Lyle
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
44%55%<1%
2.52
Libby Johnson
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Pearson
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheridan Pettit
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sonia Browne
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.