Teams

Talis Park / Carlquist

2026 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-24vs Players Club / GoodWon 20
W#1 DoublesCHRISTOPHER HEIM / Thomas Weisel vs Walter Smith / Todd Stepniewski6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDave Carlquist / Jayme VanCampenhout vs Mark Alterio / Andrew Good6-3, 6-4
2026-02-17vs Heritage Bay / VanKleeckWon 21
L#1 DoublesCHRISTOPHER HEIM / Thomas Weisel vs Rob Arnold / Kyle VanKleeck6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDean Cook / John Stelter vs Dan Latendre / Jack Miller6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDave Carlquist / Seth Cohen vs Patrick Kelly / Allan Alexander6-4, 6-3
2026-02-10vs Marco YMCA / GauchLost 12
W#1 DoublesMike Devereux / Peter Neville vs Chris Brewer / Ivan Korbar7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSeth Cohen / Thomas Weisel vs Ed Coringrato / THOMAS PARVESSE6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJayme VanCampenhout / Matt Hendrickson vs John Dal Bello / Wayne Erne3-6, 2-6
2026-02-03vs Windstar On The Bay / FitzpatrickWon 21
L#1 DoublesDave Carlquist / Thomas Weisel vs Paul Tedeschi / Brian Fitzpatrick2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEvan Lukasik / CHRISTOPHER HEIM vs Richard Carbeau / David DeCamp6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Stelter / Dean Cook vs Mark Goebel / David Mattox6-1, 6-1
2026-01-27vs Pelican Bay North / SaidnaweyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Devereux / Evan Lukasik vs Tom Hackett / Douglas Ferguson6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCHRISTOPHER HEIM / Thomas Weisel vs Jeffrey Warner / Richard Dowd6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDave Carlquist / John Stelter vs Thomas Thompson / William Cavell6-0, 6-0
2026-01-20vs Cambier / PackoWon 21
W#1 DoublesDave Carlquist / Thomas Weisel vs David Murray / Scott Ball5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike Devereux / Seth Cohen vs David Ashcraft / Bruce Bailey6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJohn Stelter / Dean Cook vs Gerald Petros / Howard Bramson2-6, 4-6
2026-01-13vs COLLIER/ Longshore Lake / MintzLost 03
L#1 DoublesSeth Cohen / Evan Lukasik vs Marco Arilli / John Franta3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCHRISTOPHER HEIM / Dave Carlquist vs Gerard Benner / Ben Yocom3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDean Cook / Steve Buonaiuto vs David Keely / Andy Mintz1-6, 2-6
2026-01-06vs Isles of Collier / C. YoungWon 30
W#1 DoublesDave Carlquist / Peter Neville vs Mark Tice / Joe Groeller6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEvan Lukasik / Mike Devereux vs Mark Murphy / Rick Hazan7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSeth Cohen / Thomas Weisel vs Steve Gapp / Tom Dwyer6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1COLLIER/ Longshore Lake / Mintz7121314189
2Talis Park / Carlquist6216819185
3Heritage Bay / VanKleeck53141024202
4Players Club / Good44111328243
5Windstar On The Bay / Fitzpatrick2691530229
6Isles of Collier / C. Young2681634243
7Pelican Bay North / Saidnawey0822246286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Dean Cook
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.39
CHRISTOPHER HEIM
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Dave Carlquist
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Evan Lukasik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jayme VanCampenhout
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
John Stelter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Matt Hendrickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Devereux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Neville
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Seth Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Steve Buonaiuto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Weisel
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

CHRISTOPHER HEIM + Thomas Weisel213 matchesnot enough data
Dean Cook + John Stelter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dean Cook
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
CHRISTOPHER HEIM
6W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Dave Carlquist
75W–71L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Evan Lukasik
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jayme VanCampenhout
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Stelter
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matt Hendrickson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mike Devereux
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Neville
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Seth Cohen
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Buonaiuto
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Weisel
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.