Teams

Isles of Collier / C. Young

2026 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-03vs Players Club / GoodLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoe Groeller / Rick Hazan vs Dean Dubbe / Larry Addabbo4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChristopher Young / Peter Oland vs Andrew Good / Walter Smith4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnthony Polonio / William Kiley vs Frank Ciriello / Todd Stepniewski4-6, 2-6
2026-02-24vs Heritage Bay / VanKleeckLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoe Groeller / Christopher Young vs Rob Arnold / Kyle VanKleeck4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Cohn / Tom Dwyer vs Allan Alexander / Peter Goffe2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMark Tice / Peter Oland vs Dan Latendre / Jack Miller3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-17vs Cambier / PackoLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeter Oland / Christopher Young vs William MacNicol / Howard Bramson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Cohn / Mark Murphy vs Gary McHugh / Gerald Petros6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTom Dwyer / Rick Hazan vs David Crisp / Michael Vance4-6, 4-6
2026-02-10vs COLLIER/ Longshore Lake / MintzLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe Groeller / Mark Tice vs Manny Acacio / Gerard Benner4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristopher Young / Peter Oland vs John Franta / Marco Arilli7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnthony Polonio / William Kiley vs Bruce Rosenblatt / David Keely4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-03vs Pelican Bay North / SaidnaweyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoe Groeller / Rick Hazan vs Steve Sisson / Bill Macmillan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMark Murphy / Wayne Rabley vs Thomas Saidnawey / Dewey Martinelli7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTom Dwyer / Mark Tice vs Mark Whitlam / David Descalzi6-3, 6-2
2026-01-27vs Marco YMCA / GauchLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Cohn / Wayne Rabley vs Chris Brewer / Ivan Korbar4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMark Murphy / Rick Hazan vs Ed Coringrato / THOMAS PARVESSE3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPeter Oland / Jeffrey Hendrey vs John Dal Bello / Peter Serunian2-6, 2-6
2026-01-20vs Windstar On The Bay / FitzpatrickWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoe Groeller / Wayne Rabley vs Joseph Atkins / Mark Goebel6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJames Cohn / Mark Tice vs David Mattox / William Stanhope6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRick Hazan / Christopher Young vs Richard Carbeau / Craig Leclair6-4, 6-3
2026-01-06vs Talis Park / CarlquistLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Tice / Joe Groeller vs Dave Carlquist / Peter Neville3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Murphy / Rick Hazan vs Evan Lukasik / Mike Devereux6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Gapp / Tom Dwyer vs Seth Cohen / Thomas Weisel3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1COLLIER/ Longshore Lake / Mintz7121314189
2Talis Park / Carlquist6216819185
3Heritage Bay / VanKleeck53141024202
4Players Club / Good44111328243
5Windstar On The Bay / Fitzpatrick2691530229
6Isles of Collier / C. Young2681634243
7Pelican Bay North / Saidnawey0822246286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Anthony Polonio
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
James Cohn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jeffrey Hendrey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Groeller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lance Doolittle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Tice
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Peter Oland
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Rick Hazan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Gapp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Dwyer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Wayne Rabley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
William Kiley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Tice + Joe Groeller123 matchesnot enough data
Rick Hazan + Joe Groeller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Polonio
4W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
James Cohn
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeffrey Hendrey
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joe Groeller
10W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lance Doolittle
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Tice
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Oland
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rick Hazan
4W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Gapp
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tom Dwyer
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wayne Rabley
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Kiley
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.