Teams

Cambier / Packo

2026 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-03vs Marco YMCA / GauchLost 03
L#1 DoublesGary McHugh / David Packo vs Chris Brewer / Ivan Korbar2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Crisp / Michael Vance vs Ed Coringrato / THOMAS PARVESSE6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWilliam MacNicol / Claudio Pedraita vs Peter Serunian / John Dal Bello1-6, 3-6
2026-02-24vs COLLIER/ Longshore Lake / MintzLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Crisp / Howard Bramson vs John Franta / Gerard Benner3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Ashcraft / Gerald Petros vs Manny Acacio / Marco Arilli6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClaudio Pedraita / William MacNicol vs David Keely / Ben Yocom2-6, 2-6
2026-02-17vs Isles of Collier / C. YoungWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam MacNicol / Howard Bramson vs Peter Oland / Christopher Young6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGary McHugh / Gerald Petros vs James Cohn / Mark Murphy7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Crisp / Michael Vance vs Tom Dwyer / Rick Hazan6-4, 6-4
2026-02-03vs Players Club / GoodWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Packo / Howard Bramson vs Rick Gusmano / Larry Addabbo3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Crisp / Michael Vance vs Chuck Hostnik / Mark Alterio7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBruce Bailey / David Ashcraft vs Richard Hurd / Todd Stepniewski7-5, 6-2
2026-01-27vs Heritage Bay / VanKleeckWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Packo / Gerald Petros vs Kyle VanKleeck / Dave Shober1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHoward Bramson / Bruce Bailey vs Allan Alexander / Rob Arnold6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGary McHugh / Richard Groveman vs Patrick Kelly / William Petrillo7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-20vs Talis Park / CarlquistLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Murray / Scott Ball vs Dave Carlquist / Thomas Weisel7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Ashcraft / Bruce Bailey vs Mike Devereux / Seth Cohen1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGerald Petros / Howard Bramson vs John Stelter / Dean Cook6-2, 6-4
2026-01-13vs Windstar On The Bay / FitzpatrickWon 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam MacNicol / Claudio Pedraita vs Mark Goebel / David Mattox6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Ashcraft / Bruce Bailey vs Brian Fitzpatrick / Joseph Atkins6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Packo / Gerald Petros vs Richard Carbeau / Theo Loughrey6-3, 6-2
2026-01-06vs Pelican Bay North / SaidnaweyWon 21
L#1 DoublesGary McHugh / Howard Bramson vs Steve Sisson / Tom Hackett7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Crisp / Michael Vance vs Douglas Ferguson / Mark Whitlam4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Murray / Scott Ball vs Richard Dowd / Brian Homet6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Murray
published 4
3.27
Gary McHugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Bruce Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
David Ashcraft
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
David Packo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Claudio Pedraita
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
David Crisp
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Gerald Petros
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Howard Bramson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Michael Vance
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Richard Groveman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Ball
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
William MacNicol
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Vance + David Crisp3442% gamesnot enough data
Claudio Pedraita + Richard Groveman1543% gamesnot enough data
David Ashcraft + Bruce Bailey314 matchesnot enough data
William MacNicol + Claudio Pedraita044 matchesnot enough data
David Packo + Howard Bramson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Murray
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Gary McHugh
27W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Bruce Bailey
16W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
David Ashcraft
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
David Packo
11W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Claudio Pedraita
7W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
David Crisp
8W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Gerald Petros
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Howard Bramson
10W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Vance
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Groveman
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Scott Ball
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
William MacNicol
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.